Re: X is Alive!

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: X is Alive!
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 12. Mar 2024, 04:42:01
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <tvfvui5hb2tm3v6ceo4t29nccb32c6pkn5@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
wrote:
Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote at 00:16 this Tuesday (GMT):
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>
MS ignored me for a LONG time when I kept complaining that Outlook
online never actually deleted messages (even though you moved them to
Trash, then went to Trash and deleted them again, you could still
resurrect the motherfuckers.)  I complained about it every few months
and nothing was done.  I gave up.
>
That was years ago.  I just checked, and you can still "recover" stuff
you tried to delete 2x already.  I just "recovered" old emails from 2.5
months ago, even though the screen says "Items in this folder will be
deleted in 30 days."
>
Gawd.  Just delete them already!  I HATE that kind of handholding.
>
A better argument against M$ Office could not have been offered.
>
The trash system is already a safety net, you don't need to keep it
saved.


Microsoft is just trying to be all-inclusive, but at the expense of
common sense it would appear.  I had actually been using the Outlook
for Windows beta before I flushed Win11, it worked well with my MS
account's email as well as my Google account's, but having Edge and
Chrome to access the respective accounts under Linux is just as good.
It wasn't the same Outlook that was included in the Office suite of
software.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
5 Oct 24 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal