Re: This FOSS Thang :-)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: This FOSS Thang :-)
De : recscuba_google (at) *nospam* huntzinger.com (-hh)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 16. Mar 2024, 21:54:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <ut4tdh$32464$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 3/12/24 2:16 PM, Nuxxie wrote:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 13:43:52 -0400, -hh wrote:
 
>
What we've seen with some Linux fanboy braggarts
>
 Why thank you.  Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
 
>
is that one can write
very speedy code if one optimistically assumes that there's no on ever
doing anything malicious to hack into a system,
>
 I can state, not optimistically but with absolute certainty, that there
is/has/will no one ever doing anything malicious to hack into my system.
 Nope.  Never has.  Never will.
That you know of.  Unfortunately, when your system is absent of security crosschecks, you basically have no way of knowing.

so there's zero overhead
to validate/sandbox the inputs.
>
 It's not just valdating the inputs but a plethora of other things that
the distros enforct that really, truly, and unequivocally degrade the
performance of system.
Sure, but one needs only but one simple example for simple minds.

Distro lackeys, like you, are using deliberately crippled systems.
Where what "crippled" means is, of course, left conveniently vague.

Fortunately, CPU power now easily exceeds the 80% use case demands,
>
 Not MY use case.
Oh, for you I agree:  state of the shelf CPUs from a decade ago easily exceeds 200% of what you actually use or need.

But then that's just more excuse mongering from an idiot that is forced
to use a crippled system and is helplessly trapped therein.
Allegedly "crippled"...which is still conveniently unspecified.
-hh

Date Sujet#  Auteur
5 Oct 24 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal