Re: This FOSS Thang :-)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: This FOSS Thang :-)
De : recscuba_google (at) *nospam* huntzinger.com (-hh)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 22. Mar 2024, 15:49:44
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <utk29p$2um3a$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 3/21/24 6:46 PM, chrisv wrote:
-hh wrote:
 
chrisv wrote:
>
In the paragraph that I responded-to in my previous post, -highhorse
dishonestly frames the argument, he claims that a reasonable and
correct argument "backfired", and he conjures-up and attacks with shit
which is clearly untrue, like his "clear example of
do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do" nonsense.
>
IOW, nothing but garbage.  That's classic -highhorse, when he's
defeated, butthurt, and has got nothing *but* garbage to respond with.
>
(snipped, unread)
Snipped by chrisv:
"Did you ever spend even but a moment to describe your evaluation process when buying components on NewEgg, in how to weed out the good from bad?"

 Is anyone fooled by -highhorse's garbage, when it goes unrebutted?
Got cite for when you actually did what you snipped out above?

All of us long-timers have seen his MO.  When he's wrong, he makes
assertions that are clearly false.  He denies things which are clearly
true.  He trots-out atrocious "logic".
With citations to world experts such as Schwartz /s

 What kind of fool thinks that humping an obviously *stupid* DumFSck
attack is the path to "victory"?  Does anyone here think that
DumFSck's argument, which -highhorse supported, was good?
 When will he learn?  There's not "too much choice" in *any* market,
and no amount of idiocy from fools who think that they know better
than the market is going to change that.
 
World experts (see Schwartz) have proven that you're wrong:  the paradox of choice is that "more is better" has diminishing returns, such that after a threshhold is reached, the effort to optimize further is overshadowed by the increase in effort to evaluate those more choices.
Which is precisely how & why DFS nailed you as a lying hypocrite on this over a decade ago:  you do this 'short cutting' yourself, but you refused to admit that by never actually articulating just how you sorted through the many build options on NewEgg to exploit said "many".
And you'll continue to whine and cry ... unproductively ... at anyone who points out your hypocrisy, and every time that you snip and "unread" is an explicit admission by you that you know that you're a liar and a hypocrite.  You made your bed, so lay in it.
-hh

Date Sujet#  Auteur
5 Oct 24 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal