Sujet : Re: pipewire (was: Re: No, the topic wasn't mp3's)
De : candycanearter07 (at) *nospam* candycanearter07.nomail.afraid (candycanearter07)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 13. Apr 2024, 02:30:02
Autres entêtes
Organisation : the-candyden-of-code
Message-ID : <uvcjma$2kqh8$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
vallor <
vallor@cultnix.org> wrote at 02:44 this Friday (GMT):
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 03:05:59 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
<ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in <uv7k2m$1f7vt$1@dont-email.me>:
>
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 23:36:45 -0000 (UTC), vallor wrote:
I brought up pulseaudio's superior sound-routing capabilities.
All the smart distros are using PipeWire now.
>
Mint has pipewire available, but I'm not using it -- too new for me.
>
(Read: I haven't gone and looked at it yet.)
>
Actually -- hey! I'm pretty sure I asked in here a few weeks ago
if anyone had tried pipewire. Besides the sound, I like the idea
of being able to intercept my camera feed to add effects.[*]
>
How is it?
>
[*] You can already do this with a virtual camera device and
obs-studio...pipewire just seems like a cleaner solution.
I think pipewire works alright.
-- user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom
No, the topic wasn't mp3's
Re: No, the topic wasn't mp3's