Sujet : Re: pipewire
De : OFeem1987 (at) *nospam* teleworm.us (Chris Ahlstrom)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 13. Apr 2024, 16:56:18
Autres entêtes
Organisation : None
Message-ID : <uve6ei$32826$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
candycanearter07 wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote at 02:44 this Friday (GMT):
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 03:05:59 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
<ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in <uv7k2m$1f7vt$1@dont-email.me>:
>
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 23:36:45 -0000 (UTC), vallor wrote:
I brought up pulseaudio's superior sound-routing capabilities.
All the smart distros are using PipeWire now.
>
Mint has pipewire available, but I'm not using it -- too new for me.
>
(Read: I haven't gone and looked at it yet.)
>
Actually -- hey! I'm pretty sure I asked in here a few weeks ago
if anyone had tried pipewire. Besides the sound, I like the idea
of being able to intercept my camera feed to add effects.[*]
>
How is it?
>
[*] You can already do this with a virtual camera device and
obs-studio...pipewire just seems like a cleaner solution.
>
I think pipewire works alright.
This guy tried Pipewire for a couple months, but then had to revert
to JACK + PulseAudio. This 12-minute video explains why:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvWgm6aZTQA Is PipeWire ready for audio production (in Q4 2021) ?
That was in 2021, so surely his issues have been solved. Would be interesting
to follow up on it.
-- Tonight's the night: Sleep in a eucalyptus tree.