Sujet : Re: Linux Desktop. Why No One Wants It.
De : ronb02NOSPAM (at) *nospam* gmail.com (RonB)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 08. May 2024, 04:01:46
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v1emea$3mufo$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
On 2024-05-07, candycanearter07 <
candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> wrote:
Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote at 07:56 this Sunday (GMT):
Le 04-05-2024, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> a écrit :
On Sat, 04 May 2024 15:28:49 +0000, Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote in
<17cc52bcdcc5a36a$57923$2329237$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>:
>
GNU/Linux is a PROFESSIONAL OS. My FVWM3 GUI looks like a pro
interface,
and other WMs look pro as well.
>
Your GUI doesn't look like anything -- it's a black screen.
>
He should change the color of the background to blue. Like that it would
look like a BSOD and no one would be able to see when it's broken.
>
>
That would be painful to look at, depending on the shade.
I'm trying to figure out *which* Linux desktop no one supposedly wants. My
problem is I like several of them.
-- [Self-centered, Woke] "pride is a life of self-destructive fakery, an entrapment to a false and self-created matrix of twisted unreality." "It was pride that changed angels into devils..." — St. Augustine