Sujet : Re: "The first Copilot+ PC has been tested ? and it destroys the MacBook" (was: "The first Copilot+ PC has been tested and it destroys the MacBook")
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 24. May 2024, 18:17:14
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <haf15jt4hdtubu7rr54ig0pd3s84bh7qdu@4ax.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Tyrone <
none@none.none> wrote:
https://www.yahoo.com/tech/first-copilot-pc-tested-destroys-135658453.html
>
Oh look. Yet ANOTHER invalid comparison.
>
The MacBook Air they used for this very contrived test has an 8 core M3. The
actual low-end version. Of COURSE the Qualcomm X elite is faster, it has a 12
core CPU.
>
Why don't they test against a 12 core M3 MacBook Pro? Or a 14 core model? Or a
16 core model?
>
Not to mention that the M3 is last year's chip from Apple. The M4 Macbooks
will be available soon.
>
Apple has nothing to worry about, and Microsoft just appears to be very
desperate by publishing these meaningless stories. "The report was compiled by
Ryan Shrout, an ex-Intel employee who’s now a part of Signal65, and it was
commissioned by Microsoft."
I will concede you likely know this better than I would have,
nevertheless, it shows where this is heading. M$ is nothing if not
open to change.
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.