Liste des Groupes | Revenir à col advocacy |
On 2024-05-27 8:22 p.m., RonB wrote:On 2024-05-27, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:>On 2024-05-27 9:02 a.m., RonB wrote:On 2024-05-27, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:>On 2024-05-26 7:50 p.m., candycanearter07 wrote:>Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote at 21:49 this Saturday (GMT):>DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:>
>Get a real sound editing app for free (like most good application>
software, it's not available for Linux):
>
https://www.audacityteam.org/
>
Audacity is the industry standard, right?
To be fair, what the industry uses shouldn't matter to a home user.
Except for the fact that, ideally, the reason industry uses it, is because
it is stable. (Not always the case, I understand.)
Certain industries have valid reasons for choosing one product over
another, and stability is not always part of it. I'm thinking of
WordPerfect in law offices and Google Workspace in schools, for example.
Sometimes, it is because of exclusive features like in the case of
WordPerfect; at other times, it is simply because the company behind the
product had the least expensive offering as in Google's case.
I played around with Google Docs for awhile. Then I read somewhere where
somebody got on the wrong side of Google and they shut down his Google
account and locked him out of his documents. That was all I needed to know
about Google Docs.
It happened again as per a new article by Bryan Lunduke. Apparently,
Google decided that a document a Pfizer whistleblower shared was too
dangerous, so they blocked it.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.