Sujet : Re: WinTel tower PC With a mouse & a large monitor.
De : ronb02NOSPAM (at) *nospam* gmail.com (RonB)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 18. Sep 2024, 09:51:21
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vce4a9$f96$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
On 2024-09-18, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <
ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On 17 Sep 2024 12:37:24 GMT, vallor wrote:
>
On Tue, 17 Sep 2024 05:30:40 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
<ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in <vcb460$3bu28$1@dont-email.me>:
On 17 Sep 2024 02:11:42 GMT, rbowman wrote:
... the NUC was not designed to compete with the Pi. Intel's marketing
was haphazard and the units arguably were overpriced.
So what *was* it designed to compete with?
Systems such as VESA-mountable PC's, as well as the Mac Minis.
>
Those are not “barebones” kits. The Raspberry Pi is a “barebones” kit. NUC
is/was a “barebones” kit. Therefore it can’t have been aimed at
non-“barebones” competitors, could it?
The NUC was NOT a barebones kit. You must be mistaken about what a NUC was.
Here's a link to a NUC on Amazon (U.S.).
https://www.amazon.com/NUC11PAHI7-i7-1165G7-Frequency-Graphics-4-Screen/dp/B0CDWMGZ4R/ref=sr_1_1?crid=1TJDJR3W0L6NQ&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.UG3mvQv9KVr9170KoYSuirSchmSd1ViK77BOwp3KA8nT3hB9HkBsyqbSB6XSYoRjgYG9_YUu1RbvYCKB_Xk5z-U3IigT6ZxdtP88hmbLFxBg-a544ckSQfJvI0oLPyv77bl6tVV7YtRJ57p8nwXfxQJpGhwYcFkbcs_UBcR6CLylsJy8KugC-xUcpCTCFvQVhT5GFBgbw_4aIzl5-34QIKI4cQui9fXtj8nkWI3uuIcmeWBsGdNCsP7VUs2bZP7s9k7HpnqMh_fm6TuPnfSrplwokl-T1QUCZ9BJVEs9I6Q.Ik3N5Q4w-RBqA8sUrSjzVii6GVWGJr_IE2HD9b-x7No&dib_tag=se&keywords=intel%2Bnuc&nav_sdd=aps&qid=1726649289&refinements=p_n_feature_four_browse-bin%3A2289792011&rnid=676578011&s=pc&sprefix=intel%2Bnuc&sr=1-1&th=111th Generation i7, 32 GBs of RAM, 1 TB SSD, etc. NOT a barebones kit.
-- “Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien