Re: A "big" PC (compared to a "smart" phone).

chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:

rbowman wrote:

Joel wrote:

>
I would be more willing to entertain this discussion if white people
hadn't conquered North America in the first place.

>
The relevant word is 'conquered'. White Europeans prevailed through
superior technology. Sadly they degenerated to the point where they let
the third world invade, handing them cell phones and money on arrival.
>
The trend for the self-haters to cut their balls off and pretend to be
little girls is telling.

>
I guess that the kook thinks that "white people" should have no say
whatsoever, as to who is allowed to come here.
>
*Some* people would say that we built one heck of a country, here, so
*do* have a say.

I hate to be the one to tell you, Chris, but *you* are the "kook".  As
are a lot of the played out people here on Usenet in 2024, though ...

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.