Sujet : Re: Linux 6.11
De : vallor (at) *nospam* cultnix.org (vallor)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 21. Sep 2024, 17:53:09
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <ll8bvlFqp7pU1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Pan/0.160 (Toresk; 4b657684; Linux-6.11.0)
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 15:53:10 +0000, Diego Garcia <
dg@chaos.rocks> wrote in
<
17f74d50a832220a$1642$1111581$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 15:27:49 +0000, Diego Garcia wrote:
Probably 99% of commercial software is built with this philosophy.
That's why a simple text editor on Microslop Winblows can be 300Mb.
Let's contrast this with the quintessential Unix editor "cooledit,"
which
is a total GUI program with extensive features:
ls -l /usr/local/bin/cooledit
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 342400 Sep 25 2021 /usr/local/bin/cooledit
We need also the shared library:
ls -l /usr/local/lib64/libCw.so.1.0.0
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 597768 Sep 25 2021 /usr/local/lib64/libCw.so.
1.0.0
So, 342400 + 597768 = 940168
Thus, for only 940 Kbytes on GNU/Linux we have a text editor that
surpasses
most, if not all, Microslop text editors that require 300X the code.
Whew! If that's not an indictment of the junk Microslop I don't know
what would
be.
Keep in mind that cooledit has syntax highlighting, compiling,
debugging, email,
and a LOT of other fundamental stuff built in -- all within less than a
megabyte
of code.
That's GNU/Linux power!
I just looked at Cooledit screen shots, and thought "ugh".
The fonts are fugly, for one.
I just use joe in my terminal window, which has smooth
fonts, as well as syntax highlighting. I won't tolerate
pixelated fonts in any of my programs
$ ll /usr/bin/joe
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 747344 Sep 5 2019 /usr/bin/joe
But I'm not going to play "editor wars". If you like
Cooledit, more power to you.
-- -v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti OS: Linux 6.11.0 Release: Mint 21.3 Mem: 258G "Unsolicited advice answers unasked questions"