Re: Linux 6.11

On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 17:34:05 +0000, Lester Thorpe <lt@gnu.rocks> wrote in
<pan$def33$a213bc3c$8c953fcc$4965f138@gnu.rocks>:
 

On 22 Sep 2024 16:59:13 GMT, vallor wrote:
>
>

Keep it.  The screenshot shows a font that -- while less jaggy -- is
still jaggy.
>
(My terminal emulator font is "Liberation Mono Regular" and looks
typeset.)
>
>

Jaggy my fucking ass.

 Okay, so your fucking ass is jaggy too.
 

Your monitor must be FUBAR cheap Chinese junk.

 No, it's not.
 

>
The fonts are rendered using libfreetype and in cooledit they are the
same quality as in any other application.

 Then why are they jaggy?
 

On my system Liberation is clear, crisp, and impeccable.

 I can't help it if you have no discernment.
 https://imgur.com/bAiSkLe
 That's what it should look like, not what you posted.
 

Your system must be total junk, or your eyeballs must be FUBAR.

 Your screenshot shows _less_ jaggies than the original screenshot
I saw, but yelling and shaking your fist at the clouds won't
change the sub-optimal anti-aliasing in the screenshot you posted.
 

Also remember: my assessment is worth far, far, far more than your
warped opinions and fucked up perception.

 Everybody can see the flaws in your screenshot.  You aren't
fooling anybody.
 BTW, if I were a suspicious person, I'd think you tried
to blur the screenshot to make the font look less jaggy.
Again, you're fooling nobody.
 

I MANGLE people who dare to doubt my phenomenal expertise.

 The only thing you mangle is your font.