Re: Linux 6.11

vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:

On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 01:37:32 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
<0iv1fjtmfn4se0l5iipluanomt80q69ca0@4ax.com>:

vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:

On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 00:46:27 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
<jis1fj5uuti4lrigo1e56sfk7l42iin75k@4ax.com>:

DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:

On 9/22/2024 4:29 PM, vallor wrote:
>

https://imgur.com/bAiSkLe

>
 Those are darn sharp, even when enlarged.

 
See: https://i.imgur.com/bAiSkLe.png

>
What is the point?

 
Just that if you find the raw image, it's what DFS stated "when
enlarged", the image as it first appears on your link's page is
*shrunk*.

>
That makes sense.  (They are the same size on my screen, but
I use a 4K monitor.)

I have one too, actually, but it may not appear quite the same
depending on how the browser is configured, I guess.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.