Liste des Groupes | Revenir à col advocacy |
On 2024-09-24, 186282@ud0s4.net <186283@ud0s4.net> wrote:In the beginning, there was FORTRAN and BASIC, But Lo, the Angel of the Code came down ands said 'thou shalt receive great blessing and speak directly to the Hardware, if thou learn Microprocessor Assembler. And Lo it was so, and got me many shekels, but then The Angel Gabriel whispered in my ear that 'C' was almost as good but ten times faster to write, and in my desire for even more shekels per week I did learn it, and so it was.On 9/21/24 8:03 AM, Farley Flud wrote:100% with this last poster, and in my opinion any compiled systemsRust is laughable garbage.Look ... 'Rust' is really no better, or worse, than
>
a LOT of existing computer languages. If you LIKE
its vibe, USE it. If not, DON'T
>
Python wasn't always popular. Took time to build
a real following.
>
Me, I'd rather use 'C' ... which was a brand new
language when I got into computers - it was the
Cool New Thing on PDP-11s. However the syntax IS,
and especially can be MADE, a bit obscure. More
'obvious', 'self-documenting' langs DO have an
advantage.
>
language is better than any BS scripting language like those people
"writing" 'system' programs for systems on a scripting language like
"python" may as well use bash as well :D :D. See there are opinion of
all kind.. boils down to, use in your computer what you think is better,
recompile the kernel, make your own kernel flavor, or fork is the beauty
of the world of free software. I for example never use python for a
system program always look for C/C++/Go/Rust... etc scripting languages
I use to patch shit up and write scripts.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.