Re: Linux advocacy

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Linux advocacy
De : candycanearter07 (at) *nospam* candycanearter07.nomail.afraid (candycanearter07)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 25. Sep 2024, 15:20:04
Autres entêtes
Organisation : the-candyden-of-code
Message-ID : <slrnvf86h4.1bf5e.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote at 11:41 this Wednesday (GMT):
rbowman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
On 25 Sep 2024 03:35:35 GMT, vallor wrote:
>
I've set up my scorefile to ignore posts crossposted to various groups.
Can you do that in slrn?
>
Yes. I've never tried it but I think you can use a Pan Score file with
slrn.
>
You can score based on anything in the header, perhaps using regex as well.
>
    https://www.slrn.org/docs/slrn-FAQ-4.html
>
    4.15 How do I score all cross-posts?
>
    Like the previous answer you have two choices: to use the ``Xref'' line
    (preferred) or the ``Newsgroups'' line. The first choice uses the fact that
    a cross-posted article will have two colons in the ``Xref'' header field.
    So, use a score of the form:
>
            Score: -9999
            Xref: :.*:
>
    If you do not have the option of using the ``Xref'' line, use:
>
            Score: -9999
            Newsgroups: ,
>
    However, you may want to tolerate cross-posts if a ``Followup-To'' header
    line is set. The following rule scores articles that are cross-posted into
    many groups (e.g. more than 2) and have no ``Followup-To'' line (note that
    this rule is ``expensive'', as usually neither ``Newsgroups'' nor
    ``Followup-To'' are included in the NOV data).
>
            Score: -9999
            Newsgroups: ,.*,
            ~Followup-To: .


Ah right, I keep forgetting you can do that ^^" I should stop
procrastinating on that
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Sep 24 * Linux advocacy112vallor
24 Sep 24 +* Re: Linux advocacy6Joel
28 Sep 24 i`* Re: Linux advocacy5Stéphane CARPENTIER
30 Sep 24 i +- Re: Linux advocacy1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24 i `* Re: Linux advocacy3Joel
5 Oct 24 i  +- Re: Linux advocacy1DFS
12 Oct 24 i  `- Re: Linux advocacy1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24 +* Re: Linux advocacy4-hh
24 Sep 24 i`* Re: Linux advocacy3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24 i +- Re: Linux advocacy1-hh
24 Sep 24 i `- Re: Linux advocacy1vallor
24 Sep 24 +* Re: Linux advocacy80Sn!pe
24 Sep 24 i+* Re: Linux advocacy11Joel
25 Sep 24 ii`* Re: Linux advocacy10vallor
25 Sep 24 ii `* Re: Linux advocacy9Joel
25 Sep 24 ii  +* Re: Linux advocacy3vallor
25 Sep 24 ii  i`* Re: Linux advocacy2Joel
25 Sep 24 ii  i `- Re: Linux advocacy1%
25 Sep 24 ii  +* Re: Linux advocacy4DFS
25 Sep 24 ii  i+* Re: Linux advocacy2rbowman
25 Sep 24 ii  ii`- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
25 Sep 24 ii  i`- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
25 Sep 24 ii  `- Re: Linux advocacy1%
24 Sep 24 i+* Re: Linux advocacy7Lester Thorpe
24 Sep 24 ii+- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
26 Sep 24 ii`* Re: Linux advocacy5-hh
26 Sep 24 ii `* Re: Linux advocacy4vallor
26 Sep 24 ii  `* Re: Linux advocacy3-hh
26 Sep 24 ii   +- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
30 Sep 24 ii   `- Re: Linux advocacy1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24 i+* Re: Linux advocacy57Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24 ii`* Re: Linux advocacy56Joel
25 Sep 24 ii `* Re: Linux advocacy55Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24 ii  `* Re: Linux advocacy54Joel
25 Sep 24 ii   `* Re: Linux advocacy53DFS
25 Sep 24 ii    +* Re: Linux advocacy31Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24 ii    i+* Re: Linux advocacy3Joel
25 Sep 24 ii    ii`* Re: Linux advocacy2DFS
25 Sep 24 ii    ii `- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
25 Sep 24 ii    i+* Re: Linux advocacy18rbowman
25 Sep 24 ii    ii`* Re: Linux advocacy17Sn!pe
25 Sep 24 ii    ii +* Re: Linux advocacy14rbowman
26 Sep 24 ii    ii i+- Re: Linux advocacy1rbowman
26 Sep 24 ii    ii i`* Re: Linux advocacy12Joel
26 Sep 24 ii    ii i `* Re: Linux advocacy11Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Sep 24 ii    ii i  `* Re: Linux advocacy10Joel
30 Sep 24 ii    ii i   `* Re: Linux advocacy9Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Sep 24 ii    ii i    `* Re: Linux advocacy8candycanearter07
1 Oct 24 ii    ii i     +- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
2 Oct 24 ii    ii i     +* Re: Linux advocacy4candycanearter07
3 Oct 24 ii    ii i     i`* Re: Linux advocacy3candycanearter07
3 Oct 24 ii    ii i     i +- Re: Linux advocacy1rbowman
3 Oct 24 ii    ii i     i `- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
4 Oct 24 ii    ii i     `* Re: Linux advocacy2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24 ii    ii i      `- Re: Linux advocacy1candycanearter07
26 Sep 24 ii    ii `* Re: Linux advocacy2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Sep 24 ii    ii  `- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
25 Sep 24 ii    i`* Re: Linux advocacy9DFS
26 Sep 24 ii    i +* Re: Linux advocacy4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Sep 24 ii    i i`* Re: Linux advocacy3DFS
26 Sep 24 ii    i i `* Re: Linux advocacy2-hh
26 Sep 24 ii    i i  `- Re: Linux advocacy1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Sep 24 ii    i `* Re: Linux advocacy4Stéphane CARPENTIER
30 Sep 24 ii    i  `* Re: Linux advocacy3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24 ii    i   `* Re: Linux advocacy2Stéphane CARPENTIER
12 Oct 24 ii    i    `- Re: Linux advocacy1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24 ii    +* Re: Linux advocacy6Joel
25 Sep 24 ii    i`* Re: Linux advocacy5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24 ii    i `* Re: Linux advocacy4Joel
25 Sep 24 ii    i  `* Re: Linux advocacy3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24 ii    i   +- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
25 Sep 24 ii    i   `- Re: Linux advocacy1DFS
26 Sep 24 ii    `* Re: Linux advocacy15-hh
26 Sep 24 ii     +* Re: Linux advocacy2Joel
26 Sep 24 ii     i`- Re: Linux advocacy1-hh
26 Sep 24 ii     +* Re: Linux advocacy7Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Sep 24 ii     i+* Re: Linux advocacy2vallor
26 Sep 24 ii     ii`- Re: Linux advocacy1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Sep 24 ii     i`* Re: Linux advocacy4-hh
30 Sep 24 ii     i `* Re: Linux advocacy3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Sep 24 ii     i  `* Re: Linux advocacy2-hh
4 Oct 24 ii     i   `- Re: Linux advocacy1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Sep 24 ii     +- Re: Linux advocacy1Chris Ahlstrom
26 Sep 24 ii     +* Re: Linux advocacy2-hh
27 Sep 24 ii     i`- Re: Linux advocacy1RonB
27 Sep 24 ii     `* Re: Linux advocacy2RonB
27 Sep 24 ii      `- Re: Linux advocacy1-hh
25 Sep 24 i+* Re: Linux advocacy3vallor
25 Sep 24 ii+- Re: Linux advocacy1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24 ii`- Re: Linux advocacy1Sn!pe
28 Sep 24 i`- Re: Linux advocacy1Stéphane CARPENTIER
24 Sep 24 +- Re: Linux advocacy1Lester Thorpe
24 Sep 24 +* Re: Linux advocacy5candycanearter07
25 Sep 24 i`* Re: Linux advocacy4vallor
25 Sep 24 i `* Re: Linux advocacy3rbowman
25 Sep 24 i  `* Re: Linux advocacy2Chris Ahlstrom
25 Sep 24 i   `- Re: Linux advocacy1candycanearter07
30 Sep 24 `* Re: Linux advocacy15John McCue
30 Sep 24  +* Re: Linux advocacy6vallor
30 Sep 24  i`* Re: Linux advocacy5candycanearter07
1 Oct 24  i +- Re: Linux advocacy1rbowman
1 Oct 24  i `* Re: Linux advocacy3vallor
4 Oct 24  `* Re: Linux advocacy8Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal