Re: Linux advocacy

chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:

rbowman wrote:

Sn!pe wrote:

rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

 
Apple users think they're so clever, classless, and free but they're
still fucking peasants as far as I can see and love their little feudal
domain.

>
Sour grapes?  Whatever, use of Apple kit is not compulsory.  If you
choose to exclude yourself from the joy of Apple, that's your choice.

>
Not sour grapes but perhaps a relic from the old days. Apple users tended
to be artsy-fartsy types. I wouldn't be surprised if they still tend
toward the left end of the scale and like their safe, curated environment.

>
Oh, come on.  The Mac is a reasonble choice of computer.  There's all
kinds of people in the world, you know.

It has Unix within it, I grant that, but the Apple GUI is goofball
shit, just like the damn iPhone.  I'm intrigued by the liking of it,
Samsung's phones seem *eons* better, to me.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.