Sujet : Re: Linux advocacy
De : recscuba_google (at) *nospam* huntzinger.com (-hh)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 26. Sep 2024, 13:03:58
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vd3ije$5t69$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 9/26/24 1:41 AM, vallor wrote:
On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 23:19:40 -0400, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>
wrote in <vd2jsc$3le3m$3@dont-email.me>:
On 9/24/24 2:29 PM, Lester Thorpe wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 14:20:02 +0100, Sn!pe wrote:
>
>
A 'puter is supposed to be a tool to do a job,
the underpinnings should ideally be unnoticeable.
>
>
Incorrect, Apple fathead.
>
A computer is a "general purpose machine," which means
that it doesn't do anything but it embodies the potential
to do everything.
>
Yet over the past 40 years, they've grown into being much more than just
a PDP-11 with a teletype terminal. They now serve many duties, one of
which is even cat pictures! /s
>
>
(Apple shitheads don't venture within 100 miles of Comp Sci.)
>
However, in order to do something, a computer must be
"programmed," and thus the "underpinnings" are of paramount
importance.
>
In contrast, Apple devices, and Apple users, are mere appliances.
>
Oh, so did you write your own newsreader from scratch to fabricate this
very post, "Lester"? Or did you use someone else's canned software as
your productivity tool, so you're just being a hypocrite?
>
They are set to do a single task, however convoluted that task
may appear.
>
But the Apple user, like YOU, is a total lackey.
>
He will, without question, hand over his BIG $BUCKS to Apple
and associates for the brief luxury of having a "turn key"
system.
>
>
Oh, look: This "BIG $BUCKS" another explicit reference to cost, in the
context of Apple products vs others. Now tagged for those who try to
deny the "Linux cheapskates" topic. :-)
? Don't be absurd.
I'm not: I'm just noting where others have whined about costs on Applr products.
I paid more for my Thelio Mega from System76 than we paid for the
Mac Studio -- the latter being more of a "Unix workstation" than
Feeb's cobbled-together Xeon mess.
Sure, because workstation class PCs have shot up in price ~5 years ago: I noticed the same thing when I was shopping to replace my Mac Pro and was actually seriously considering migrating some stuff to Windows.
(I was advocating getting a Mac Pro, but the Missus balked at the cost.
The Mac Studio was a good compromise, and still included the neural engine.)
Which with the Apple ARM chip instead of Intel, aligns with their main product line, so it has a more promising developmental future as well as being ~half the cost of the last Mac Pro.
-hh