Re: Linux advocacy

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Linux advocacy
De : recscuba_google (at) *nospam* huntzinger.com (-hh)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 26. Sep 2024, 13:03:58
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vd3ije$5t69$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 9/26/24 1:41 AM, vallor wrote:
On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 23:19:40 -0400, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>
wrote in <vd2jsc$3le3m$3@dont-email.me>:
 
On 9/24/24 2:29 PM, Lester Thorpe wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 14:20:02 +0100, Sn!pe wrote:
>
>
A 'puter is supposed to be a tool to do a job,
the underpinnings should ideally be unnoticeable.
>
>
Incorrect, Apple fathead.
>
A computer is a "general purpose machine," which means
that it doesn't do anything but it embodies the potential
to do everything.
>
Yet over the past 40 years, they've grown into being much more than just
a PDP-11 with a teletype terminal. They now serve many duties, one of
which is even cat pictures! /s
>
>
(Apple shitheads don't venture within 100 miles of Comp Sci.)
>
However, in order to do something, a computer must be
"programmed," and thus the "underpinnings" are of paramount
importance.
>
In contrast, Apple devices, and Apple users, are mere appliances.
>
Oh, so did you write your own newsreader from scratch to fabricate this
very post, "Lester"?  Or did you use someone else's canned software as
your productivity tool, so you're just being a hypocrite?
>
They are set to do a single task, however convoluted that task
may appear.
>
But the Apple user, like YOU, is a total lackey.
>
He will, without question, hand over his BIG $BUCKS to Apple
and associates for the brief luxury of having a "turn key"
system.
>
>
Oh, look:  This "BIG $BUCKS" another explicit reference to cost, in the
context of Apple products vs others.  Now tagged for those who try to
deny the "Linux cheapskates" topic.  :-)
 ?  Don't be absurd.
I'm not: I'm just noting where others have whined about costs on Applr products.

I paid more for my Thelio Mega from System76 than we paid for the
Mac Studio -- the latter being more of a "Unix workstation" than
Feeb's cobbled-together Xeon mess.
Sure, because workstation class PCs have shot up in price ~5 years ago: I noticed the same thing when I was shopping to replace my Mac Pro and was actually seriously considering migrating some stuff to Windows.

(I was advocating getting a Mac Pro, but the Missus balked at the cost.
The Mac Studio was a good compromise, and still included the neural engine.)
Which with the Apple ARM chip instead of Intel, aligns with their main product line, so it has a more promising developmental future as well as being ~half the cost of the last Mac Pro.
-hh

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Sep 24 * Linux advocacy112vallor
24 Sep 24 +* Re: Linux advocacy6Joel
28 Sep 24 i`* Re: Linux advocacy5Stéphane CARPENTIER
30 Sep 24 i +- Re: Linux advocacy1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24 i `* Re: Linux advocacy3Joel
5 Oct 24 i  +- Re: Linux advocacy1DFS
12 Oct 24 i  `- Re: Linux advocacy1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24 +* Re: Linux advocacy4-hh
24 Sep 24 i`* Re: Linux advocacy3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24 i +- Re: Linux advocacy1-hh
24 Sep 24 i `- Re: Linux advocacy1vallor
24 Sep 24 +* Re: Linux advocacy80Sn!pe
24 Sep 24 i+* Re: Linux advocacy11Joel
25 Sep 24 ii`* Re: Linux advocacy10vallor
25 Sep 24 ii `* Re: Linux advocacy9Joel
25 Sep 24 ii  +* Re: Linux advocacy3vallor
25 Sep 24 ii  i`* Re: Linux advocacy2Joel
25 Sep 24 ii  i `- Re: Linux advocacy1%
25 Sep 24 ii  +* Re: Linux advocacy4DFS
25 Sep 24 ii  i+* Re: Linux advocacy2rbowman
25 Sep 24 ii  ii`- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
25 Sep 24 ii  i`- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
25 Sep 24 ii  `- Re: Linux advocacy1%
24 Sep 24 i+* Re: Linux advocacy7Lester Thorpe
24 Sep 24 ii+- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
26 Sep 24 ii`* Re: Linux advocacy5-hh
26 Sep 24 ii `* Re: Linux advocacy4vallor
26 Sep 24 ii  `* Re: Linux advocacy3-hh
26 Sep 24 ii   +- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
30 Sep 24 ii   `- Re: Linux advocacy1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24 i+* Re: Linux advocacy57Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24 ii`* Re: Linux advocacy56Joel
25 Sep 24 ii `* Re: Linux advocacy55Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24 ii  `* Re: Linux advocacy54Joel
25 Sep 24 ii   `* Re: Linux advocacy53DFS
25 Sep 24 ii    +* Re: Linux advocacy31Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24 ii    i+* Re: Linux advocacy3Joel
25 Sep 24 ii    ii`* Re: Linux advocacy2DFS
25 Sep 24 ii    ii `- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
25 Sep 24 ii    i+* Re: Linux advocacy18rbowman
25 Sep 24 ii    ii`* Re: Linux advocacy17Sn!pe
25 Sep 24 ii    ii +* Re: Linux advocacy14rbowman
26 Sep 24 ii    ii i+- Re: Linux advocacy1rbowman
26 Sep 24 ii    ii i`* Re: Linux advocacy12Joel
26 Sep 24 ii    ii i `* Re: Linux advocacy11Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Sep 24 ii    ii i  `* Re: Linux advocacy10Joel
30 Sep 24 ii    ii i   `* Re: Linux advocacy9Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Sep 24 ii    ii i    `* Re: Linux advocacy8candycanearter07
1 Oct 24 ii    ii i     +- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
2 Oct 24 ii    ii i     +* Re: Linux advocacy4candycanearter07
3 Oct 24 ii    ii i     i`* Re: Linux advocacy3candycanearter07
3 Oct 24 ii    ii i     i +- Re: Linux advocacy1rbowman
3 Oct 24 ii    ii i     i `- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
4 Oct 24 ii    ii i     `* Re: Linux advocacy2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24 ii    ii i      `- Re: Linux advocacy1candycanearter07
26 Sep 24 ii    ii `* Re: Linux advocacy2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Sep 24 ii    ii  `- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
25 Sep 24 ii    i`* Re: Linux advocacy9DFS
26 Sep 24 ii    i +* Re: Linux advocacy4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Sep 24 ii    i i`* Re: Linux advocacy3DFS
26 Sep 24 ii    i i `* Re: Linux advocacy2-hh
26 Sep 24 ii    i i  `- Re: Linux advocacy1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Sep 24 ii    i `* Re: Linux advocacy4Stéphane CARPENTIER
30 Sep 24 ii    i  `* Re: Linux advocacy3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24 ii    i   `* Re: Linux advocacy2Stéphane CARPENTIER
12 Oct 24 ii    i    `- Re: Linux advocacy1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24 ii    +* Re: Linux advocacy6Joel
25 Sep 24 ii    i`* Re: Linux advocacy5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24 ii    i `* Re: Linux advocacy4Joel
25 Sep 24 ii    i  `* Re: Linux advocacy3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24 ii    i   +- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
25 Sep 24 ii    i   `- Re: Linux advocacy1DFS
26 Sep 24 ii    `* Re: Linux advocacy15-hh
26 Sep 24 ii     +* Re: Linux advocacy2Joel
26 Sep 24 ii     i`- Re: Linux advocacy1-hh
26 Sep 24 ii     +* Re: Linux advocacy7Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Sep 24 ii     i+* Re: Linux advocacy2vallor
26 Sep 24 ii     ii`- Re: Linux advocacy1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Sep 24 ii     i`* Re: Linux advocacy4-hh
30 Sep 24 ii     i `* Re: Linux advocacy3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Sep 24 ii     i  `* Re: Linux advocacy2-hh
4 Oct 24 ii     i   `- Re: Linux advocacy1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Sep 24 ii     +- Re: Linux advocacy1Chris Ahlstrom
26 Sep 24 ii     +* Re: Linux advocacy2-hh
27 Sep 24 ii     i`- Re: Linux advocacy1RonB
27 Sep 24 ii     `* Re: Linux advocacy2RonB
27 Sep 24 ii      `- Re: Linux advocacy1-hh
25 Sep 24 i+* Re: Linux advocacy3vallor
25 Sep 24 ii+- Re: Linux advocacy1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24 ii`- Re: Linux advocacy1Sn!pe
28 Sep 24 i`- Re: Linux advocacy1Stéphane CARPENTIER
24 Sep 24 +- Re: Linux advocacy1Lester Thorpe
24 Sep 24 +* Re: Linux advocacy5candycanearter07
25 Sep 24 i`* Re: Linux advocacy4vallor
25 Sep 24 i `* Re: Linux advocacy3rbowman
25 Sep 24 i  `* Re: Linux advocacy2Chris Ahlstrom
25 Sep 24 i   `- Re: Linux advocacy1candycanearter07
30 Sep 24 `* Re: Linux advocacy15John McCue
30 Sep 24  +* Re: Linux advocacy6vallor
30 Sep 24  i`* Re: Linux advocacy5candycanearter07
1 Oct 24  i +- Re: Linux advocacy1rbowman
1 Oct 24  i `* Re: Linux advocacy3vallor
4 Oct 24  `* Re: Linux advocacy8Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal