Re: 9.9/10 vulnerability revealed: it's the printers!

chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:

Joel wrote:

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

 

Is what I did not superior, in relating the results?

>
No. Text is searchable and indexable, and can also be quoted. We see this
all too often in online open-source support forums, particularly from
users who are too accustomed to Dimdows systems, posting screenshots of
text messages instead of copying and pasting the text.

>
Um, this is Usenet, not an "online support forum".  What I posted was
the correct, modern way to respond to your request.

>
I wouldn't kill you to admit that you were wrong, you know.

I was right.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.