Re: 9.9/10 vulnerability revealed: it's the printers!

vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:

On Sat, 28 Sep 2024 18:11:39 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
<fovgfjhe903sn6gktn7rrlprci037kihiq@4ax.com>:

chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:

Joel wrote:

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

 

Is what I did not superior, in relating the results?

>
No. Text is searchable and indexable, and can also be quoted. We see
this all too often in online open-source support forums, particularly
from users who are too accustomed to Dimdows systems, posting
screenshots of text messages instead of copying and pasting the text.

>
Um, this is Usenet, not an "online support forum".  What I posted was
the correct, modern way to respond to your request.

>
I wouldn't kill you to admit that you were wrong, you know.

 
I was right.

>
Wrong on both counts.

I'm not backing down, one person against many on a Linux newsgroup in
2024 could be the normal one.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.