Sujet : Re: 9.9/10 vulnerability revealed: it's the printers!
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 29. Sep 2024, 01:58:34
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <oh8hfj5lst5lgoa0783f1f7isp0r5ta36g@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
DFS <
nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
On 9/28/2024 6:10 PM, Joel wrote:
vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
On Sat, 28 Sep 2024 04:12:30 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
<iheffjd8c04deaike4c94vqogblm93qd6t@4ax.com>:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>
https://i.imgur.com/47lF8YL.png
>
Posting screenshots of text, instead of just copying and pasting the
text ... sigh ...
>
Well, even on fuckin' IRC, I can turn an image into a text link with
a Ctrl-V. So, here I need Imgur.
>
You use a Linux system, but you can’t copy/paste text out of a
terminal session into a News client windows?
>
Is what I did not superior, in relating the results?
>
No. Text is searchable and indexable, and can also be quoted. We see
this all too often in online open-source support forums, particularly
from users who are too accustomed to Dimdows systems, posting
screenshots of text messages instead of copying and pasting the text.
>
Um, this is Usenet, not an "online support forum". What I posted was
the correct, modern way to respond to your request.
>
No, it wasn't.
>
Copy and paste the text, please, I don't want to
go peer at your images of plain text.
Then don't click the link, idiot. Not my problem, if you're another
one of these old people stuck in your ways. Modern people would show
this as a screenshot. Get fucked.
>
OK, now you're in timeout until you understand the error of your ways.
>
Screenshots of a few lines of terminal text is verboten; it's a waste of
time and computing resources.
>
And it makes you look like a weird newb.
Wow, another person on the bandwagon. We can't modernize Usenet. Run
Windows 7, then, dummy, come on. If you can't do what I did
efficiently, you don't have GIMP.
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.