Sujet : Re: Linux 6.11
De : vallor (at) *nospam* cultnix.org (vallor)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 29. Sep 2024, 10:06:07
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <llsjjvFrnukU4@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Pan/0.160 (Toresk; 54aa2a97; Linux-6.11.0)
On 29 Sep 2024 08:17:03 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER <
sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote
in <
66f90cff$0$3244$426a74cc@news.free.fr>:
Le 29-09-2024, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> a écrit :
On 2024-09-28, Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote:
Le 22-09-2024, Lester Thorpe <lt@gnu.rocks> a écrit :
Cooledit is the choice all GNU/Linux aficionados.
>
Nope. Vim and Emacs are the first choices. By far.
>
JOE is the way to go... at least for me.
You do what you want, I don't care. It changes nothing at what I said.
The number of users of Joe in the Linux world is very tiny compared to
the number of users of Emacs and vim. It doesn't mean vim and Emacs are
better than JOE or cooledit. It means that cooledit and JOE are far from
the editors of choice of all Linux aficionados.
Well sure. That's the great thing about Linux (and Unix in general):
people can choose the tool of their choice to do whatever.
Doesn't mean cooledit, or vim, or Emacs aren't fine editors themselves.
Different strokes, and all that.
I like chocolate ice cream, some folks like strawberry. There is no
"one true ice cream", nor is there "one true editor"...all a matter
of taste.
-- -v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti OS: Linux 6.11.0 Release: Mint 21.3 Mem: 258G "And God said: E = (+mv) - (Ze)/r ...and there *WAS* light!"