Sujet : Re: Linux 6.11
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 29. Sep 2024, 11:45:17
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <8sbifjd2gjob1fdiqb0nr4q00neepl0ove@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Lester Thorpe <
lt@gnu.rocks> wrote:
How many GNU/Linux users have even heard of cooledit? Not very many.
Cooledit is not included in any distro, except maybe Mageia:
>
http://fr2.rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=cooledit&submit=Search+...
>
If cooledit were promoted a bit more it may gather a following.
>
Unlike vim, emacs, and joe, cooledit is a graphical editor with a
complete GUI interface.
>
I try to promote cooledit but the narrow-minded, parochial imbeciles
in this group will summarily reject it because it boggles their little
minds.
Looks like a piece of shit, actually, get a fuckin' distro.
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.