Sujet : Re: .PDF files are PostScript.
De : sc (at) *nospam* fiat-linux.fr (Stéphane CARPENTIER)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 29. Sep 2024, 14:14:23
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Mulots' Killer
Message-ID : <66f952af$0$3253$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
Le 29-09-2024, Nux Vomica <
nv@linux.rocks> a écrit :
On 29 Sep 2024 02:25:51 GMT, rbowman wrote:
>
.PDF files are PostScript. Open one in a text editor, you'll see.
Absolutely not. PostScript is a Turing complete, stack oriiented, RPN
language.
>
Incorrect. It is absolutely fucking true.
Nope. And you just managed to prove you are wrong in your own answer.
PDF is derived entirely from PostScript as a SUBSET:
So:
- "it's derived" means they both evolved independently and what was true
years ago isn't today.
- "SUBSET" means everything isn't included so it's not the same thing.
The difference between the PDF and PostScript is that the PDF
lacks the general-purpose programming language framework of the PostScript
language."
So when rbowman says one is a Turing complet programming language, and
the other is not is true.
Good job proving you are wrong claiming others are.
-- Si vous avez du temps à perdre :https://scarpet42.gitlab.io
…