Re: Linux 6.11

Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote:

Yet, you posted this:
>
https://i.imgur.com/fUXvwdR.png

>
As unlike your claim of using your brain about the subject, you refuse
to used your brain to understand what's explained to you, I'll answer
that just once.
>
For a start, I don't know what he posted and I don't care. When you sent
this message, did you want to be read and understood? If no, good job
keep going like this. If yes, you loose. I don't know what's behind your
link and I don't care. So if you want me to know it, you put text in
your message, not a screenshot of text.

Fail.  Heh.

2024 Usenet ...

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.