Re: .PDF files are PostScript.

Le 29-09-2024, Nux Vomica <nv@linux.rocks> a écrit :

On 29 Sep 2024 13:14:23 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>

So when rbowman says one is a Turing complet programming language, and
the other is not is true.

>
Blowman, like you, is a total idiot.

Can't improve a little bit instead of repeating yourself? Are you really
that limited?

The relevant portion of the Wiki quote is this:
>
"The PDF and PostScript share the same imaging model and both documents
are mutually convertible to each other."

That's a very good one. You can convert a jpg into a gif, so the gif is
the same thing as a bmp? If you convert a format into another, it's well
because it's not the same, so it needs a conversion.

When one say that a Microsoft PowerPoint document .pptx is a zip file,
it's because it can be opened by a zip utility and looked into without
changing anything. There is nothing to convert.
When you want to open a PostScript file in a pdf viewer it's not always
able to open it without plugin.

IOW, PostScript is dynamic but PDF is static.
>
But how they render content is EXACTLY the same.

And you can encapsulate a jpg file into PostScript and so the render
content will be exactly the same. So an image is a PostScript document?

So SHUT THE FUCK UP!

You can still shoot how long as you want, I'm still not listening to your
advices.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io