Re: Linux 6.11

Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote:

When you sent
this message, did you want to be read and understood? If no, good job
keep going like this. If yes, you loose. I don't know what's behind your
link and I don't care. So if you want me to know it, you put text in
your message, not a screenshot of text.

>
Fail.  Heh.

>
Yep, I'm not that surprised. You can't understand. You can't respect
others, you can only request them to respect you. But it doesn't work
that way. The respect goes either both ways or doesn't go.
>

2024 Usenet ...

>
Yes, your brain isn't improving when time is passing. In anyone it's
true, but it's truer for you with all the drugs and alcohol you take.

Free hint, I'm here because of Linux, politics, and to keep Usenet
relevant, not to please un-modern people who might even be a majority,
here.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.