Sujet : Re: Neither rBowman nor Carpentier know what "Turing Completeness" means.
De : bowman (at) *nospam* montana.com (rbowman)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 29. Sep 2024, 19:57:09
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <lltm85F3ksjU1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
On Sun, 29 Sep 2024 08:27:51 -0700 (Seattle), Relf wrote:
You(DetroitsFinest)Replied(to Carpentier):
So, [as] rbowman says:
"one is a Turing Complete programming language, and the other is
not".
Blowman, like you, is a total idiot.
Neither rBowman nor Carpentier know what "Turing Completeness" means.
%PDF-1.2 44 0 obj << /E 2248 /H [ 957 193 ] /L 57656 /Linearized 1
>> endobj
https://riptutorial.com/postscriptEducate yourself.
Let Me Show Yous How To Print
Re: Let Me Show Yous How To Print
