Re: 9.9/10 vulnerability revealed: it's the printers!

DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:

Screenshots of a few lines of terminal text is verboten; it's a waste of
time and computing resources.
>
And it makes you look like a weird newb.

 
Wow, another person on the bandwagon. 

>
Are you getting a clue yet?
>
Stubbornness while being wrong is
>

We can't modernize Usenet.  Run
Windows 7, then, dummy, come on.  If you can't do what I did
efficiently, you don't have GIMP.

>
Posting a link to a silly image isn't modernizing Usenet.  What would be
nice is counters to track views and upvotes/downvotes.  But that would
mean a centralized way to manage unique user logins and some kind of IP
or ID tracker to go along with the post headers.  Very much against the
anonymous, decentralized structure of Usenet.
>
Did you really need to involve the Gimp bloatware in this operation?  I
figured a modern Linux would have a quick screenshot app like Win11's
nifty Snipping Tool.
>
MS is doomed by screenshots of 2 lines of code.

I used the screenshot utility to make the image, GIMP to export it to
PNG.  Probably there's a way to export it within the utility, but I
normally don't need these things as files, Usenet is just that
ancient.  But it can take a URL, as I posted initially - and thus have
been right despite everyone else claiming otherwise.  2024 Usenet.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.