Sujet : Re: Linux 6.11
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 29. Sep 2024, 22:28:47
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <ijhjfjpdcu9bs7morthve0br4ja9pingsh@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Stéphane CARPENTIER <
sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote:
Free hint, I'm here because of Linux, politics, and to keep Usenet
relevant, not to please un-modern people who might even be a majority,
here.
>
You keep claiming you are modernizing usenet, but never bring any
argument explaining why your way is modern. Apart from imposing your
ugly tastes to others because you want to, your way does nothing.
You find clicking an Imgur link burdensome?
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
…