Re: Linux 6.11

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Linux 6.11
De : nntp (at) *nospam* fulltermprivacy.com (Phillip Frabott)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 01. Oct 2024, 00:42:29
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vdfd15$2e2ub$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : NewsLeecher v7.0 Final (http://www.newsleecher.com)
In reply to "Lester Thorpe" who wrote the following:

On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 19:05:12 -0000 (UTC), Phillip Frabott wrote:
 
Now I haven't looked at Cooledit myself but I would have to ask what
exact technological issue is Cooledit solving that other software does not
already solve?
 
 
It's a fucking text/programming editor.  What major "innovations"
can any simple text/programming editor bring?  Would you like it
to wash your soiled, shit-stained underwear as well.  Idiot.
 
You are obviously caught up in some bizarre and illusory idealism.
 
Cooledit does the job.  Furthermore, its GUI is dependent only
on X Window libraries and thus is immune to the GTK+/Qt bullshit.
 
Actually, if one uses the Midnight Commander (MC) file manager, then one
is using basal cooledit because the MC edit uses the same code base.
 
Cooledit is not perfect but it is FOSS and thus it depends on contributions
from the FOSS community.
 
But it is quite apparent that you are just another GNU/Linux freeloader who
wants freedom, only as in beer, without giving anything in return.
 
So fuck your idealism.  Any program that does the job of existing programs
is certainly worthy of consideration.
 
 
 
--
Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.

So to be clear the technological issue that Cooledit tries to solve is that
other editors have a dependency on GTK/Qt and Cooledit doesn't. I'm
understanding that correctly, yes?

I can see that you've had a lot of people against you for Cooledit as I can see
at least 2 weeks of back and forth so I'm going to give you a pass on your
argumentative reply. I'm not trying to argue with you. I'm just wanting to
understand the purpose of Cooledit and what would be the selling point of it for
someone to choose it over something else. Not having to rely on GTK/Qt or any
other X UI framework is a pretty good selling point. Means it can be used on
systems that require minimal X windows deployments with minimal dependencies.
I've never used MC myself so I can't speak to that, but there is probably a good
market for a minimal dependency editor in a GUI system for those who do use a
GUI so that's pretty cool.
Phillip Frabott
----------
- Adam: Is a void really a void if it returns?
- Jack: No, it's just nullspace at that point.
----------


--
----------------------------------------- --- -- -
Posted with NewsLeecher v7.0 Final
Free Newsreader @ http://www.newsleecher.com/
------------------------------- ----- ---- -- -


Date Sujet#  Auteur
28 Sep 24 * Re: Linux 6.1151Stéphane CARPENTIER
29 Sep 24 `* Re: Linux 6.1150RonB
29 Sep 24  +- Re: Linux 6.111vallor
29 Sep 24  `* Re: Linux 6.1148Stéphane CARPENTIER
29 Sep 24   +* Re: Linux 6.1146vallor
29 Sep 24   i+* Re: Linux 6.1125Joel
29 Sep 24   ii+* Re: Linux 6.112vallor
29 Sep 24   iii`- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
29 Sep 24   ii`* Re: Linux 6.1122Stéphane CARPENTIER
29 Sep 24   ii `* Re: Linux 6.1121Joel
29 Sep 24   ii  `* Re: Linux 6.1120Stéphane CARPENTIER
29 Sep 24   ii   +* Re: Linux 6.117Joel
29 Sep 24   ii   i+* Re: Linux 6.113Stéphane CARPENTIER
29 Sep 24   ii   ii`* Re: Linux 6.112Joel
4 Oct 24   ii   ii `- Re: Linux 6.111Stéphane CARPENTIER
30 Sep 24   ii   i`* Re: Linux 6.113%
1 Oct 24   ii   i +- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
1 Oct 24   ii   i `- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
30 Sep 24   ii   +- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
30 Sep 24   ii   `* Re: Linux 6.1111RonB
1 Oct 24   ii    +- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
1 Oct 24   ii    +* Re: Linux 6.112Joel
1 Oct 24   ii    i`- Re: Linux 6.111%
1 Oct 24   ii    `* Re: Linux 6.117RonB
1 Oct 24   ii     +- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
1 Oct 24   ii     `* Re: Linux 6.115Joel
1 Oct 24   ii      `* Re: Linux 6.114rbowman
4 Oct 24   ii       `* Re: Linux 6.113Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24   ii        `* Re: Linux 6.112rbowman
5 Oct 24   ii         `- Re: Linux 6.111RonB
29 Sep 24   i`* Re: Linux 6.1120Lester Thorpe
29 Sep 24   i +- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
29 Sep 24   i +- Re: Linux 6.111Chris Ahlstrom
29 Sep 24   i `* Re: Linux 6.1117Stéphane CARPENTIER
29 Sep 24   i  +- Re: Linux 6.111RonB
30 Sep 24   i  `* Re: Linux 6.1115Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Sep 24   i   +* Re: Linux 6.1112rbowman
30 Sep 24   i   i`* Re: Linux 6.1111Phillip Frabott
30 Sep 24   i   i +* Re: Linux 6.116Lester Thorpe
1 Oct 24   i   i i+* Re: Linux 6.114Phillip Frabott
1 Oct 24   i   i ii+- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
4 Oct 24   i   i ii`* Re: Linux 6.112Stéphane CARPENTIER
5 Oct 24   i   i ii `- Re: Linux 6.111DFS
1 Oct 24   i   i i`- Re: Linux 6.111DFS
1 Oct 24   i   i +* Re: Linux 6.113RonB
1 Oct 24   i   i i`* Re: Linux 6.112rbowman
4 Oct 24   i   i i `- Re: Linux 6.111Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24   i   i `- Re: Linux 6.111Stéphane CARPENTIER
4 Oct 24   i   `* Re: Linux 6.112Stéphane CARPENTIER
15 Oct 24   i    `- Re: Linux 6.111Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Sep 24   `- Re: Linux 6.111RonB

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal