Sujet : Re: Linux 6.11
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 01. Oct 2024, 03:34:26
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <5snmfj138lov2nesjrh42of9nn2efhofsp@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
CrudeSausage <
crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2024-09-30 2:38 a.m., RonB wrote:
On 2024-09-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2024-09-29 2:20 p.m., Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
Le 29-09-2024, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
2024 Usenet ...
>
Yes, your brain isn't improving when time is passing. In anyone it's
true, but it's truer for you with all the drugs and alcohol you take.
>
I'm just waiting for him to call you homophobic for disagreeing with
him. That's how the feeble-minded usually work.
Yep. The Woke insult you all they want, but if you return the insult they
whine that you're a "hater." Strangely enough they never apply that epithet
to themselves.
>
I've gotten to the point that when they call me a racist, a sexist (this
one's not true, I'm very kind to women), a homophobe, a transphobe, an
anti-Semite or whatever else, I just say "yes." Their entire attack
revolves around you being labelled something so that whatever comes out
of your mouth is immediately dismissed by anyone listening who is just
as stupid. In my experience, people no longer care about labels and will
actually listen to what you're saying so once you smile and say "sure, I
am all those things you say," they'll scream and repeat that you
admitted to it, but everyone else will listen to your argument and
generally agree with it. They'll end up looking like the screeching
banshees that they are, and you will have won the argument.
You're a white guy.
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.