Re: Linux 6.11

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Linux 6.11
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 01. Oct 2024, 16:06:24
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <fo3ofjpn3u8tmim5lq963eip5g3otcom90@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
On 10/1/2024 12:06 AM, Joel wrote:
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
On 9/30/2024 3:35 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
the day can’t be far off before WSL2 becomes a mandatory part>>> of
a Dimdows install.
>
Keep hope alive!
 
Microsoft Windows on a computer you keep a long time,
>
I ran my last system ~12 years.  Same mobo and case and power supply,
but upgraded the RAM and video card and storage and monitor.


And with Linux, that box would still be like new.


depending on that arbitrary, aging version,
>
meaningless babble
>
Keep this in mind: most of the world will use desktop Windows their
entire lives.


Speaking of "meaningless", "most of the world" isn't motivated to know
about the alternative.


until your computer finally blows its brains out.
>
ha!  So far my Windows systems exhibit no suicidal ideation.


And yet you did finally replace it, to get Win11.


I choose Linux.
>
And Wine to run Windows apps.


Very selected, minor ones.


I'm just not close to being willing to give up MS Office, Notepad++,
SumatraPDF and other apps in exchange for the Linux alternatives.  FML
if I was ever forced to use LibreOffice and Thunar every day - that is
some seriously craptastic software.


You would put up with Win11Copilot for that shit?  Christ.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
19 Sep 24 * Linux 6.11169vallor
19 Sep 24 +* Re: Linux 6.1110DFS
1 Oct 24 i`* Re: Linux 6.119Joel
1 Oct 24 i `* Re: Linux 6.118DFS
1 Oct 24 i  +* Re: Linux 6.116Joel
3 Oct 24 i  i`* Re: Linux 6.115DFS
3 Oct 24 i  i `* Re: Linux 6.114Joel
21 Oct 24 i  i  `* Re: Linux 6.113Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Oct 24 i  i   `* Re: Linux 6.112Joel
21 Oct 24 i  i    `- Re: Linux 6.111Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Oct 24 i  `- Re: Linux 6.111vallor
20 Sep 24 +- Re: Linux 6.111Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 Sep 24 `* Re: Linux 6.11157Cy DeMillion
21 Sep 24  `* Re: Linux 6.11156vallor
21 Sep 24   `* Re: Linux 6.11155Diego Garcia
21 Sep 24    `* Re: Linux 6.11154Diego Garcia
21 Sep 24     `* Re: Linux 6.11153vallor
21 Sep 24      `* Re: Linux 6.11152Lester Thorpe
22 Sep 24       `* Re: Linux 6.11151vallor
22 Sep 24        +* Re: Linux 6.1182Stéphane CARPENTIER
22 Sep 24        i`* Re: Linux 6.1181Lester Thorpe
22 Sep 24        i +* Re: Linux 6.1174DFS
23 Sep 24        i i+* Re: Linux 6.1171Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Sep 24        i ii+* Re: Linux 6.1166DFS
23 Sep 24        i iii+* Re: Linux 6.1150Joel
24 Sep 24        i iiii`* Re: Linux 6.1149DFS
24 Sep 24        i iiii `* Re: Linux 6.1148Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24        i iiii  +* Re: Linux 6.1139DFS
30 Sep 24        i iiii  i`* Re: Linux 6.1138Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Oct 24        i iiii  i `* Re: Linux 6.1137DFS
1 Oct 24        i iiii  i  +* Re: Linux 6.1118Joel
1 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i`* Re: Linux 6.1117DFS
1 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i +* Re: Linux 6.119Joel
1 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i`* Re: Linux 6.118DFS
1 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i +- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
2 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i +- Re: Linux 6.111rbowman
4 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i `* Re: Linux 6.115Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i  +- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
9 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i  `* Re: Linux 6.113DFS
12 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i   `* Re: Linux 6.112Lawrence D'Oliveiro
12 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i    `- Re: Linux 6.111Chris Ahlstrom
4 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i +* Re: Linux 6.116Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i`* Re: Linux 6.115DFS
12 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i `* Re: Linux 6.114Lawrence D'Oliveiro
13 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i  `* Re: Linux 6.113DFS
13 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i   +- Re: Linux 6.111DFS
15 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i   `- Re: Linux 6.111Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i `- Re: Linux 6.111Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24        i iiii  i  +* Re: Linux 6.112Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i`- Re: Linux 6.111DFS
4 Oct 24        i iiii  i  `* Re: Linux 6.1116Chris Ahlstrom
4 Oct 24        i iiii  i   `* Re: Linux 6.1115rbowman
5 Oct 24        i iiii  i    +* Re: Linux 6.118RonB
5 Oct 24        i iiii  i    i`* Re: Linux 6.117rbowman
5 Oct 24        i iiii  i    i `* Re: Linux 6.116Chris Ahlstrom
6 Oct 24        i iiii  i    i  `* Re: Linux 6.115rbowman
15 Oct 24        i iiii  i    i   `* Re: Linux 6.114Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Oct 24        i iiii  i    i    +* Re: Linux 6.112Chris Ahlstrom
15 Oct 24        i iiii  i    i    i`- Re: Linux 6.111rbowman
15 Oct 24        i iiii  i    i    `- Re: Linux 6.111rbowman
5 Oct 24        i iiii  i    +- Re: Linux 6.111Chris Ahlstrom
15 Oct 24        i iiii  i    `* Re: Linux 6.115Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Oct 24        i iiii  i     `* Re: Linux 6.114rbowman
15 Oct 24        i iiii  i      `* Re: Linux 6.113Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Oct 24        i iiii  i       `* Re: Linux 6.112rbowman
16 Oct 24        i iiii  i        `- Re: Linux 6.111Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24        i iiii  `* Re: Linux 6.118Chris Ahlstrom
25 Sep 24        i iiii   `* Re: Linux 6.117candycanearter07
25 Sep 24        i iiii    +* Re: Linux 6.114Chris Ahlstrom
26 Sep 24        i iiii    i+* Re: Linux 6.112candycanearter07
26 Sep 24        i iiii    ii`- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
26 Sep 24        i iiii    i`- Re: Linux 6.111rbowman
28 Sep 24        i iiii    `* Re: Linux 6.112Stéphane CARPENTIER
28 Sep 24        i iiii     `- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
23 Sep 24        i iii+* Re: Linux 6.1113rbowman
24 Sep 24        i iiii`* Re: Linux 6.1112Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24        i iiii +* Re: Linux 6.119rbowman
24 Sep 24        i iiii i`* Re: Linux 6.118Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24        i iiii i +* Re: Linux 6.116rbowman
30 Sep 24        i iiii i i`* Re: Linux 6.115Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Sep 24        i iiii i i `* Re: Linux 6.114rbowman
4 Oct 24        i iiii i i  `* Re: Linux 6.113Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24        i iiii i i   `* Re: Linux 6.112rbowman
12 Oct 24        i iiii i i    `- Re: Linux 6.111Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24        i iiii i `- Re: Linux 6.111DFS
24 Sep 24        i iiii `* Re: Linux 6.112vallor
24 Sep 24        i iiii  `- Re: Linux 6.111rbowman
24 Sep 24        i iii`* Re: Linux 6.112Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24        i iii `- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
23 Sep 24        i ii`* Re: Linux 6.114vallor
24 Sep 24        i ii +- Re: Linux 6.111Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24        i ii `* Re: Linux 6.112Lester Thorpe
24 Sep 24        i ii  `- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
29 Sep 24        i i`* Re: Linux 6.112Joel
29 Sep 24        i i `- Re: Linux 6.111DFS
22 Sep 24        i `* Re: Linux 6.116Stéphane CARPENTIER
22 Sep 24        i  +* Re: Linux 6.113vallor
22 Sep 24        i  i`* Re: Linux 6.112%
23 Sep 24        i  i `- Re: Linux 6.111vallor
23 Sep 24        i  +- Re: Linux 6.111DFS
28 Sep 24        i  `- Re: Linux 6.111Stéphane CARPENTIER
22 Sep 24        +* Re: Linux 6.116DFS
22 Sep 24        `* Re: Linux 6.1162vallor

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal