Re: If you're a fucking moron

chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:

vallor wrote:

Joel wrote:

>
https://www.wired.com/story/mustafa-suleyman-interview-microsoft-ai-ceo-copilot/

>
Oh, good grief.
>

Quoting the end of the article:
>
[ regaring sooper dooper capabilities of Copilot ]:
>
"If we can nail that, that's the foundation of a trusted experience, and
then I think we can really push into the complicated side of things, which
is how do we let it buy things for you on your behalf, or negotiate on
your behalf, or enter into a contract on your behalf, or plan a schedule
for you that involves three or four different stops over the course of a
Saturday afternoon. And you're like, I trust you, Copilot, you got this,
right? That's really what we're working toward."
>
_Enter into a contract on your behalf?_  The man is stark, raving, mad.

>
These people have no limits.

Yeah, this is where Winblows is at, in 2024-2025.  This is what you
get when you run Win11.  I'm excited about the new hardware advances
we're seeing - but not because of AI.  I believe we're on the verge of
a revolution that *can* *include* AI, "if [one is] a fucking moron",
but can also be about other things, like right now I still have a
fairly new and usable desktop, but I could get my ass an ARM laptop
already, not from Apple, delete Win11Copilot and be on my merry way.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.