Sujet : Re: Linux 6.11
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 03. Oct 2024, 15:14:40
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <ll8tfjdshj7pf2ncd503qgk6uvatgcqv33@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
DFS <
nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
To me, vallor's observation of RAM use is normal. Maybe you
trust Copilot+ to handle that for you.
>
I was referring to his obsession with installing new Linux kernels every
time he changes his underwear.
He's "advocating Linux", dude. The great control he has even as a
Mint user.
>
He's just bored. Linux is a tinkertoy for adult geeks.
You think NT can't be one? How do you think Relf controlled his Win10
updating? How do you think Mark Russinovich started a business to
document Microsoft's internals, that they bought out and named
Sysinternals, hiring him as a tenured resource, he released a
presentation on video in the time of Win7 where he demonstrates MinWin
and talks about OS core matters as an official act for MS.
Reverse-engineering is just par for the course.
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.