Re: Linux advocacy

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Linux advocacy
De : bowman (at) *nospam* montana.com (rbowman)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 03. Oct 2024, 18:47:09
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <lm83ktFlrc3U2@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
User-Agent : Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 12:13:23 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:

Yeah, but I doubt that Apple cares. They want people to go through their
store the way that Microsoft wants you to. The problem is that both of
their stores are loaded with absolute shite. If they can improve the
quality of what people will find when they're looking for software, I
doubt that anyone will mind that their favourite open-source app can
exclusively be acquired through it.

The store was the reason for dropping iPhones from the project. The app
allowed emergency responders to have an overview of what was happening in
their jurisdiction, report status changes, and do a few other operations.
It was not meant for distribution to the general public, and would only
have information for a specific site. Officer Friendly would have the
credentials to view information from Podunk PD. The total distribution
would have been in the low hundreds.

The apk could be side loaded on Android devices, probably by the site
radio tech if the officers weren't savvy enough. For Apple we had to jump
through the store hoops. After several attempts we gave up.

Okay, this was a special case but I'm sure there ware other proprietary,
limited distribution apps that ran into the same problem.

Microsoft's UWP was an attempt to channel everything through the store. I
don't know if MS ever officially declared it dead but they moved on to the
App SDK and dropped the store requirement although placing an app in the
store can be an advantage for some.

 

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Sep 24 * Linux advocacy112vallor
24 Sep 24 +* Re: Linux advocacy6Joel
28 Sep 24 i`* Re: Linux advocacy5Stéphane CARPENTIER
30 Sep 24 i +- Re: Linux advocacy1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24 i `* Re: Linux advocacy3Joel
5 Oct 24 i  +- Re: Linux advocacy1DFS
12 Oct 24 i  `- Re: Linux advocacy1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24 +* Re: Linux advocacy4-hh
24 Sep 24 i`* Re: Linux advocacy3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24 i +- Re: Linux advocacy1-hh
24 Sep 24 i `- Re: Linux advocacy1vallor
24 Sep 24 +* Re: Linux advocacy80Sn!pe
24 Sep 24 i+* Re: Linux advocacy11Joel
25 Sep 24 ii`* Re: Linux advocacy10vallor
25 Sep 24 ii `* Re: Linux advocacy9Joel
25 Sep 24 ii  +* Re: Linux advocacy3vallor
25 Sep 24 ii  i`* Re: Linux advocacy2Joel
25 Sep 24 ii  i `- Re: Linux advocacy1%
25 Sep 24 ii  +* Re: Linux advocacy4DFS
25 Sep 24 ii  i+* Re: Linux advocacy2rbowman
25 Sep 24 ii  ii`- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
25 Sep 24 ii  i`- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
25 Sep 24 ii  `- Re: Linux advocacy1%
24 Sep 24 i+* Re: Linux advocacy7Lester Thorpe
24 Sep 24 ii+- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
26 Sep 24 ii`* Re: Linux advocacy5-hh
26 Sep 24 ii `* Re: Linux advocacy4vallor
26 Sep 24 ii  `* Re: Linux advocacy3-hh
26 Sep 24 ii   +- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
30 Sep 24 ii   `- Re: Linux advocacy1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24 i+* Re: Linux advocacy57Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24 ii`* Re: Linux advocacy56Joel
25 Sep 24 ii `* Re: Linux advocacy55Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24 ii  `* Re: Linux advocacy54Joel
25 Sep 24 ii   `* Re: Linux advocacy53DFS
25 Sep 24 ii    +* Re: Linux advocacy31Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24 ii    i+* Re: Linux advocacy3Joel
25 Sep 24 ii    ii`* Re: Linux advocacy2DFS
25 Sep 24 ii    ii `- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
25 Sep 24 ii    i+* Re: Linux advocacy18rbowman
25 Sep 24 ii    ii`* Re: Linux advocacy17Sn!pe
25 Sep 24 ii    ii +* Re: Linux advocacy14rbowman
26 Sep 24 ii    ii i+- Re: Linux advocacy1rbowman
26 Sep 24 ii    ii i`* Re: Linux advocacy12Joel
26 Sep 24 ii    ii i `* Re: Linux advocacy11Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Sep 24 ii    ii i  `* Re: Linux advocacy10Joel
30 Sep 24 ii    ii i   `* Re: Linux advocacy9Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Sep 24 ii    ii i    `* Re: Linux advocacy8candycanearter07
1 Oct 24 ii    ii i     +- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
2 Oct 24 ii    ii i     +* Re: Linux advocacy4candycanearter07
3 Oct 24 ii    ii i     i`* Re: Linux advocacy3candycanearter07
3 Oct 24 ii    ii i     i +- Re: Linux advocacy1rbowman
3 Oct 24 ii    ii i     i `- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
4 Oct 24 ii    ii i     `* Re: Linux advocacy2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24 ii    ii i      `- Re: Linux advocacy1candycanearter07
26 Sep 24 ii    ii `* Re: Linux advocacy2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Sep 24 ii    ii  `- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
25 Sep 24 ii    i`* Re: Linux advocacy9DFS
26 Sep 24 ii    i +* Re: Linux advocacy4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Sep 24 ii    i i`* Re: Linux advocacy3DFS
26 Sep 24 ii    i i `* Re: Linux advocacy2-hh
26 Sep 24 ii    i i  `- Re: Linux advocacy1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Sep 24 ii    i `* Re: Linux advocacy4Stéphane CARPENTIER
30 Sep 24 ii    i  `* Re: Linux advocacy3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24 ii    i   `* Re: Linux advocacy2Stéphane CARPENTIER
12 Oct 24 ii    i    `- Re: Linux advocacy1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24 ii    +* Re: Linux advocacy6Joel
25 Sep 24 ii    i`* Re: Linux advocacy5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24 ii    i `* Re: Linux advocacy4Joel
25 Sep 24 ii    i  `* Re: Linux advocacy3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24 ii    i   +- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
25 Sep 24 ii    i   `- Re: Linux advocacy1DFS
26 Sep 24 ii    `* Re: Linux advocacy15-hh
26 Sep 24 ii     +* Re: Linux advocacy2Joel
26 Sep 24 ii     i`- Re: Linux advocacy1-hh
26 Sep 24 ii     +* Re: Linux advocacy7Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Sep 24 ii     i+* Re: Linux advocacy2vallor
26 Sep 24 ii     ii`- Re: Linux advocacy1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Sep 24 ii     i`* Re: Linux advocacy4-hh
30 Sep 24 ii     i `* Re: Linux advocacy3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Sep 24 ii     i  `* Re: Linux advocacy2-hh
4 Oct 24 ii     i   `- Re: Linux advocacy1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Sep 24 ii     +- Re: Linux advocacy1Chris Ahlstrom
26 Sep 24 ii     +* Re: Linux advocacy2-hh
27 Sep 24 ii     i`- Re: Linux advocacy1RonB
27 Sep 24 ii     `* Re: Linux advocacy2RonB
27 Sep 24 ii      `- Re: Linux advocacy1-hh
25 Sep 24 i+* Re: Linux advocacy3vallor
25 Sep 24 ii+- Re: Linux advocacy1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24 ii`- Re: Linux advocacy1Sn!pe
28 Sep 24 i`- Re: Linux advocacy1Stéphane CARPENTIER
24 Sep 24 +- Re: Linux advocacy1Lester Thorpe
24 Sep 24 +* Re: Linux advocacy5candycanearter07
25 Sep 24 i`* Re: Linux advocacy4vallor
25 Sep 24 i `* Re: Linux advocacy3rbowman
25 Sep 24 i  `* Re: Linux advocacy2Chris Ahlstrom
25 Sep 24 i   `- Re: Linux advocacy1candycanearter07
30 Sep 24 `* Re: Linux advocacy15John McCue
30 Sep 24  +* Re: Linux advocacy6vallor
30 Sep 24  i`* Re: Linux advocacy5candycanearter07
1 Oct 24  i +- Re: Linux advocacy1rbowman
1 Oct 24  i `* Re: Linux advocacy3vallor
4 Oct 24  `* Re: Linux advocacy8Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal