Re: Linux 6.11

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Linux 6.11
De : sc (at) *nospam* fiat-linux.fr (Stéphane CARPENTIER)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 04. Oct 2024, 21:00:35
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Mulots' Killer
Message-ID : <67004963$0$8246$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
Le 29-09-2024, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> a écrit :
Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote:
>
Free hint, I'm here because of Linux, politics, and to keep Usenet
relevant, not to please un-modern people who might even be a majority,
here.
>
You keep claiming you are modernizing usenet, but never bring any
argument explaining why your way is modern. Apart from imposing your
ugly tastes to others because you want to, your way does nothing.
>
You find clicking an Imgur link

Fist things first: I. Don't. Click.

I'm using a keyboard oriented reader in a keyboard oriented terminal to
display text only information. And I let FR/DG/NV/LP/whatever using his
mouse when saying the keyboard is better. I'm using my keyboard when
saying my keyboard is better. At the same time my terminal and my reader
provide me shortcuts to open some links in my browser more efficiently
than using my mouse.

Now to answer the question everyone has already answered when you
refused to listen considering pissing off everyone is not a problem if
you feel good about it.

burdensome?

Of course it is. How can you consider having a message split in two
applications not burdensome? It requires actions and it's distracting.
That's why I didn't opened you last links because it was easier for me
to consider them uninteresting than to lose time and I didn't need to
have a proof they are uninteresting. Your way to display them was
enough.

If you prefer to do a screenshot than a copy/past, good for you. It's a
strong indicator you don't want me to read it. So I don't. It's that
easy: you do what you want and I do what I want. Nothing more, nothing
less. As I said when you consider I failed: you choose if you want me to
read you or not. It's not a big deal. You don't want me to read you?
Good, I don't.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

Date Sujet#  Auteur
19 Sep 24 * Linux 6.11169vallor
19 Sep 24 +* Re: Linux 6.1110DFS
1 Oct 24 i`* Re: Linux 6.119Joel
1 Oct 24 i `* Re: Linux 6.118DFS
1 Oct 24 i  +* Re: Linux 6.116Joel
3 Oct 24 i  i`* Re: Linux 6.115DFS
3 Oct 24 i  i `* Re: Linux 6.114Joel
21 Oct 24 i  i  `* Re: Linux 6.113Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Oct 24 i  i   `* Re: Linux 6.112Joel
21 Oct 24 i  i    `- Re: Linux 6.111Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Oct 24 i  `- Re: Linux 6.111vallor
20 Sep 24 +- Re: Linux 6.111Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 Sep 24 `* Re: Linux 6.11157Cy DeMillion
21 Sep 24  `* Re: Linux 6.11156vallor
21 Sep 24   `* Re: Linux 6.11155Diego Garcia
21 Sep 24    `* Re: Linux 6.11154Diego Garcia
21 Sep 24     `* Re: Linux 6.11153vallor
21 Sep 24      `* Re: Linux 6.11152Lester Thorpe
22 Sep 24       `* Re: Linux 6.11151vallor
22 Sep 24        +* Re: Linux 6.1182Stéphane CARPENTIER
22 Sep 24        i`* Re: Linux 6.1181Lester Thorpe
22 Sep 24        i +* Re: Linux 6.1174DFS
23 Sep 24        i i+* Re: Linux 6.1171Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Sep 24        i ii+* Re: Linux 6.1166DFS
23 Sep 24        i iii+* Re: Linux 6.1150Joel
24 Sep 24        i iiii`* Re: Linux 6.1149DFS
24 Sep 24        i iiii `* Re: Linux 6.1148Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24        i iiii  +* Re: Linux 6.1139DFS
30 Sep 24        i iiii  i`* Re: Linux 6.1138Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Oct 24        i iiii  i `* Re: Linux 6.1137DFS
1 Oct 24        i iiii  i  +* Re: Linux 6.1118Joel
1 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i`* Re: Linux 6.1117DFS
1 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i +* Re: Linux 6.119Joel
1 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i`* Re: Linux 6.118DFS
1 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i +- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
2 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i +- Re: Linux 6.111rbowman
4 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i `* Re: Linux 6.115Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i  +- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
9 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i  `* Re: Linux 6.113DFS
12 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i   `* Re: Linux 6.112Lawrence D'Oliveiro
12 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i    `- Re: Linux 6.111Chris Ahlstrom
4 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i +* Re: Linux 6.116Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i`* Re: Linux 6.115DFS
12 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i `* Re: Linux 6.114Lawrence D'Oliveiro
13 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i  `* Re: Linux 6.113DFS
13 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i   +- Re: Linux 6.111DFS
15 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i   `- Re: Linux 6.111Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i `- Re: Linux 6.111Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24        i iiii  i  +* Re: Linux 6.112Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i`- Re: Linux 6.111DFS
4 Oct 24        i iiii  i  `* Re: Linux 6.1116Chris Ahlstrom
4 Oct 24        i iiii  i   `* Re: Linux 6.1115rbowman
5 Oct 24        i iiii  i    +* Re: Linux 6.118RonB
5 Oct 24        i iiii  i    i`* Re: Linux 6.117rbowman
5 Oct 24        i iiii  i    i `* Re: Linux 6.116Chris Ahlstrom
6 Oct 24        i iiii  i    i  `* Re: Linux 6.115rbowman
15 Oct 24        i iiii  i    i   `* Re: Linux 6.114Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Oct 24        i iiii  i    i    +* Re: Linux 6.112Chris Ahlstrom
15 Oct 24        i iiii  i    i    i`- Re: Linux 6.111rbowman
15 Oct 24        i iiii  i    i    `- Re: Linux 6.111rbowman
5 Oct 24        i iiii  i    +- Re: Linux 6.111Chris Ahlstrom
15 Oct 24        i iiii  i    `* Re: Linux 6.115Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Oct 24        i iiii  i     `* Re: Linux 6.114rbowman
15 Oct 24        i iiii  i      `* Re: Linux 6.113Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Oct 24        i iiii  i       `* Re: Linux 6.112rbowman
16 Oct 24        i iiii  i        `- Re: Linux 6.111Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24        i iiii  `* Re: Linux 6.118Chris Ahlstrom
25 Sep 24        i iiii   `* Re: Linux 6.117candycanearter07
25 Sep 24        i iiii    +* Re: Linux 6.114Chris Ahlstrom
26 Sep 24        i iiii    i+* Re: Linux 6.112candycanearter07
26 Sep 24        i iiii    ii`- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
26 Sep 24        i iiii    i`- Re: Linux 6.111rbowman
28 Sep 24        i iiii    `* Re: Linux 6.112Stéphane CARPENTIER
28 Sep 24        i iiii     `- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
23 Sep 24        i iii+* Re: Linux 6.1113rbowman
24 Sep 24        i iiii`* Re: Linux 6.1112Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24        i iiii +* Re: Linux 6.119rbowman
24 Sep 24        i iiii i`* Re: Linux 6.118Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24        i iiii i +* Re: Linux 6.116rbowman
30 Sep 24        i iiii i i`* Re: Linux 6.115Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Sep 24        i iiii i i `* Re: Linux 6.114rbowman
4 Oct 24        i iiii i i  `* Re: Linux 6.113Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24        i iiii i i   `* Re: Linux 6.112rbowman
12 Oct 24        i iiii i i    `- Re: Linux 6.111Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24        i iiii i `- Re: Linux 6.111DFS
24 Sep 24        i iiii `* Re: Linux 6.112vallor
24 Sep 24        i iiii  `- Re: Linux 6.111rbowman
24 Sep 24        i iii`* Re: Linux 6.112Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24        i iii `- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
23 Sep 24        i ii`* Re: Linux 6.114vallor
24 Sep 24        i ii +- Re: Linux 6.111Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24        i ii `* Re: Linux 6.112Lester Thorpe
24 Sep 24        i ii  `- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
29 Sep 24        i i`* Re: Linux 6.112Joel
29 Sep 24        i i `- Re: Linux 6.111DFS
22 Sep 24        i `* Re: Linux 6.116Stéphane CARPENTIER
22 Sep 24        i  +* Re: Linux 6.113vallor
22 Sep 24        i  i`* Re: Linux 6.112%
23 Sep 24        i  i `- Re: Linux 6.111vallor
23 Sep 24        i  +- Re: Linux 6.111DFS
28 Sep 24        i  `- Re: Linux 6.111Stéphane CARPENTIER
22 Sep 24        +* Re: Linux 6.116DFS
22 Sep 24        `* Re: Linux 6.1162vallor

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal