Re: Linux 6.11

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Linux 6.11
De : sc (at) *nospam* fiat-linux.fr (Stéphane CARPENTIER)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 04. Oct 2024, 22:02:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Mulots' Killer
Message-ID : <670057e1$0$3653$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
Le 30-09-2024, Phillip Frabott <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> a écrit :
In reply to "Lester Thorpe" who wrote the following:
>
On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 19:05:12 -0000 (UTC), Phillip Frabott wrote:
 
Now I haven't looked at Cooledit myself but I would have to ask what
exact technological issue is Cooledit solving that other software does not
already solve?
 
It's a fucking text/programming editor.  What major "innovations"
can any simple text/programming editor bring?  Would you like it
to wash your soiled, shit-stained underwear as well.  Idiot.
 
You are obviously caught up in some bizarre and illusory idealism.
 
Cooledit does the job.  Furthermore, its GUI is dependent only
on X Window libraries and thus is immune to the GTK+/Qt bullshit.
 
Actually, if one uses the Midnight Commander (MC) file manager, then one
is using basal cooledit because the MC edit uses the same code base.
 
Cooledit is not perfect but it is FOSS and thus it depends on contributions
from the FOSS community.
 
But it is quite apparent that you are just another GNU/Linux freeloader who
wants freedom, only as in beer, without giving anything in return.
 
So fuck your idealism.  Any program that does the job of existing programs
is certainly worthy of consideration.
>
So to be clear the technological issue that Cooledit tries to solve is that
other editors have a dependency on GTK/Qt and Cooledit doesn't. I'm
understanding that correctly, yes?

That was exactly my point in my previous answer to your message: he has
no clue. If someone wants a text editor without any dependencies with
any graphical library, being GTK+/QT or another, there are a lot of
possibilities. A lot of text editors can be launched in a terminal.

I can see that you've had a lot of people against you for Cooledit

No. Nobodies here knows cooledit. Nobody here cares about cooledit.
Everyone here is against him for being himself. Read his answer to you
again if you don't understand. I let it on purpose.

as I can see at least 2 weeks of back and forth so I'm going to give
you a pass on your argumentative reply.

If you really expect it you will be disappointed.

I'm not trying to argue with you.

Good idea.

I'm just wanting to understand the purpose of Cooledit and what would
be the selling point of it for someone to choose it over something
else.

You would have to ask to someone who use it. He's promoting it because
nobody knows about it and because it looks old which will be despised by
some here (I don't care aboot the look and feal of a text editor because
I don't need a mouse, so I can hide the menus and I don't see it's look
and feal).

Not having to rely on GTK/Qt or any
other X UI framework is a pretty good selling point.

Vim, Emacs, nano for a start. I hate nano but I don't care if others are
using it.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

Date Sujet#  Auteur
19 Sep 24 * Linux 6.11169vallor
19 Sep 24 +* Re: Linux 6.1110DFS
1 Oct 24 i`* Re: Linux 6.119Joel
1 Oct 24 i `* Re: Linux 6.118DFS
1 Oct 24 i  +* Re: Linux 6.116Joel
3 Oct 24 i  i`* Re: Linux 6.115DFS
3 Oct 24 i  i `* Re: Linux 6.114Joel
21 Oct 24 i  i  `* Re: Linux 6.113Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Oct 24 i  i   `* Re: Linux 6.112Joel
21 Oct 24 i  i    `- Re: Linux 6.111Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Oct 24 i  `- Re: Linux 6.111vallor
20 Sep 24 +- Re: Linux 6.111Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 Sep 24 `* Re: Linux 6.11157Cy DeMillion
21 Sep 24  `* Re: Linux 6.11156vallor
21 Sep 24   `* Re: Linux 6.11155Diego Garcia
21 Sep 24    `* Re: Linux 6.11154Diego Garcia
21 Sep 24     `* Re: Linux 6.11153vallor
21 Sep 24      `* Re: Linux 6.11152Lester Thorpe
22 Sep 24       `* Re: Linux 6.11151vallor
22 Sep 24        +* Re: Linux 6.1182Stéphane CARPENTIER
22 Sep 24        i`* Re: Linux 6.1181Lester Thorpe
22 Sep 24        i +* Re: Linux 6.1174DFS
23 Sep 24        i i+* Re: Linux 6.1171Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Sep 24        i ii+* Re: Linux 6.1166DFS
23 Sep 24        i iii+* Re: Linux 6.1150Joel
24 Sep 24        i iiii`* Re: Linux 6.1149DFS
24 Sep 24        i iiii `* Re: Linux 6.1148Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24        i iiii  +* Re: Linux 6.1139DFS
30 Sep 24        i iiii  i`* Re: Linux 6.1138Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Oct 24        i iiii  i `* Re: Linux 6.1137DFS
1 Oct 24        i iiii  i  +* Re: Linux 6.1118Joel
1 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i`* Re: Linux 6.1117DFS
1 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i +* Re: Linux 6.119Joel
1 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i`* Re: Linux 6.118DFS
1 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i +- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
2 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i +- Re: Linux 6.111rbowman
4 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i `* Re: Linux 6.115Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i  +- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
9 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i  `* Re: Linux 6.113DFS
12 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i   `* Re: Linux 6.112Lawrence D'Oliveiro
12 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i    `- Re: Linux 6.111Chris Ahlstrom
4 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i +* Re: Linux 6.116Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i`* Re: Linux 6.115DFS
12 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i `* Re: Linux 6.114Lawrence D'Oliveiro
13 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i  `* Re: Linux 6.113DFS
13 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i   +- Re: Linux 6.111DFS
15 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i i   `- Re: Linux 6.111Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i `- Re: Linux 6.111Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24        i iiii  i  +* Re: Linux 6.112Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24        i iiii  i  i`- Re: Linux 6.111DFS
4 Oct 24        i iiii  i  `* Re: Linux 6.1116Chris Ahlstrom
4 Oct 24        i iiii  i   `* Re: Linux 6.1115rbowman
5 Oct 24        i iiii  i    +* Re: Linux 6.118RonB
5 Oct 24        i iiii  i    i`* Re: Linux 6.117rbowman
5 Oct 24        i iiii  i    i `* Re: Linux 6.116Chris Ahlstrom
6 Oct 24        i iiii  i    i  `* Re: Linux 6.115rbowman
15 Oct 24        i iiii  i    i   `* Re: Linux 6.114Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Oct 24        i iiii  i    i    +* Re: Linux 6.112Chris Ahlstrom
15 Oct 24        i iiii  i    i    i`- Re: Linux 6.111rbowman
15 Oct 24        i iiii  i    i    `- Re: Linux 6.111rbowman
5 Oct 24        i iiii  i    +- Re: Linux 6.111Chris Ahlstrom
15 Oct 24        i iiii  i    `* Re: Linux 6.115Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Oct 24        i iiii  i     `* Re: Linux 6.114rbowman
15 Oct 24        i iiii  i      `* Re: Linux 6.113Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Oct 24        i iiii  i       `* Re: Linux 6.112rbowman
16 Oct 24        i iiii  i        `- Re: Linux 6.111Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24        i iiii  `* Re: Linux 6.118Chris Ahlstrom
25 Sep 24        i iiii   `* Re: Linux 6.117candycanearter07
25 Sep 24        i iiii    +* Re: Linux 6.114Chris Ahlstrom
26 Sep 24        i iiii    i+* Re: Linux 6.112candycanearter07
26 Sep 24        i iiii    ii`- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
26 Sep 24        i iiii    i`- Re: Linux 6.111rbowman
28 Sep 24        i iiii    `* Re: Linux 6.112Stéphane CARPENTIER
28 Sep 24        i iiii     `- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
23 Sep 24        i iii+* Re: Linux 6.1113rbowman
24 Sep 24        i iiii`* Re: Linux 6.1112Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24        i iiii +* Re: Linux 6.119rbowman
24 Sep 24        i iiii i`* Re: Linux 6.118Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24        i iiii i +* Re: Linux 6.116rbowman
30 Sep 24        i iiii i i`* Re: Linux 6.115Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Sep 24        i iiii i i `* Re: Linux 6.114rbowman
4 Oct 24        i iiii i i  `* Re: Linux 6.113Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24        i iiii i i   `* Re: Linux 6.112rbowman
12 Oct 24        i iiii i i    `- Re: Linux 6.111Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24        i iiii i `- Re: Linux 6.111DFS
24 Sep 24        i iiii `* Re: Linux 6.112vallor
24 Sep 24        i iiii  `- Re: Linux 6.111rbowman
24 Sep 24        i iii`* Re: Linux 6.112Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24        i iii `- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
23 Sep 24        i ii`* Re: Linux 6.114vallor
24 Sep 24        i ii +- Re: Linux 6.111Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24        i ii `* Re: Linux 6.112Lester Thorpe
24 Sep 24        i ii  `- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
29 Sep 24        i i`* Re: Linux 6.112Joel
29 Sep 24        i i `- Re: Linux 6.111DFS
22 Sep 24        i `* Re: Linux 6.116Stéphane CARPENTIER
22 Sep 24        i  +* Re: Linux 6.113vallor
22 Sep 24        i  i`* Re: Linux 6.112%
23 Sep 24        i  i `- Re: Linux 6.111vallor
23 Sep 24        i  +- Re: Linux 6.111DFS
28 Sep 24        i  `- Re: Linux 6.111Stéphane CARPENTIER
22 Sep 24        +* Re: Linux 6.116DFS
22 Sep 24        `* Re: Linux 6.1162vallor

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal