Sujet : Re: Scientific American
De : bowman (at) *nospam* montana.com (rbowman)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 10. Oct 2024, 19:36:11
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <lmql4rFgsfhU1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 09:38:25 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
rbowman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 03:17:38 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
That was a cool magazine. Martin Gardner’s maths column was how most
people discovered Conway’s “Game Of Life”, back in the day.
>
The important word is 'was'. 'National Geographic' is another 'was'.
What changed? The magazines, or you?
The magazines. 'Scientific American' never endorsed a political candidate
until Biden in 2020 and Harris in 2024. That's not science. 'National
Geographic' was dumbed down over the years and now doesn't even exist as a
print magazine afaik. The editors and staff writers were fired and it's
now a freelance effort ultimately owned by Disney.
Re: Scientific American
Re: Scientific American