Re: Scientific American

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Scientific American
De : bowman (at) *nospam* montana.com (rbowman)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 11. Oct 2024, 02:43:04
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <lmre58FkgdgU1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 18:30:50 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:


Though endorsing candidates who aren't k00ks seems good to me.

Dealing with science and leaving politics out of it would be even better.

Did you look at the old NatGeo magazine to see the topless natives?

The ones who had enlarged their lower lips with what appeared to be dinner
plates? Now if they'd done articles on topless beaches in Scandinavia,,,

The only cover photo I remember is the Afghan Girl:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afghan_Girl

There is one article where I remember the supporting photos. It was a
grain warehouse on India. The rats were clustered around saucers of milk
that were put out for them. I think the author was appalled that the milk
wasn't laced with rodenticide and so little attention was being paid to
hygiene.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
7 Oct 24 * Re: Scientific American11Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Oct 24 `* Re: Scientific American10rbowman
10 Oct 24  `* Re: Scientific American9Chris Ahlstrom
10 Oct 24   +* Re: Scientific American7rbowman
10 Oct 24   i+* Re: Scientific American3Chris Ahlstrom
11 Oct 24   ii+- Re: Scientific American1rbowman
11 Oct 24   ii`- Re: Scientific American1RonB
11 Oct 24   i+* Re: Scientific American2RonB
11 Oct 24   ii`- Re: Scientific American1rbowman
12 Oct 24   i`- Re: Scientific American1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
11 Oct 24   `- Re: Scientific American1RonB

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal