Re: Scientific American

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Scientific American
De : ronb02NOSPAM (at) *nospam* gmail.com (RonB)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 11. Oct 2024, 12:02:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <veb0k1$3krf6$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
On 2024-10-10, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
rbowman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 03:17:38 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
That was a cool magazine. Martin Gardner’s maths column was how most
people discovered Conway’s “Game Of Life”, back in the day.
>
The important word is 'was'. 'National Geographic' is another 'was'.
>
What changed? The magazines, or you?

Obviously the magazines. They used to deal with science, now they champion
the moron Woke Cult agenda.

Men can have babies, right?

--
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.”  —J.R.R. Tolkien

Date Sujet#  Auteur
7 Oct 24 * Re: Scientific American11Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Oct 24 `* Re: Scientific American10rbowman
10 Oct 24  `* Re: Scientific American9Chris Ahlstrom
10 Oct 24   +* Re: Scientific American7rbowman
10 Oct 24   i+* Re: Scientific American3Chris Ahlstrom
11 Oct 24   ii+- Re: Scientific American1rbowman
11 Oct 24   ii`- Re: Scientific American1RonB
11 Oct 24   i+* Re: Scientific American2RonB
11 Oct 24   ii`- Re: Scientific American1rbowman
12 Oct 24   i`- Re: Scientific American1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
11 Oct 24   `- Re: Scientific American1RonB

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal