Liste des Groupes | Revenir à col advocacy |
["Followup-To:" header set to comp.os.linux.advocacy.]current models may not be able to, but there is an exponential curve we are riding.
On 2024-10-12, kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:John Smyth wrote:I don't think AI will take over, as it is not really capable of'A Godfather of AI Just Won a Nobel. He Has Been Warning the Machines>
Could Take Over the World.'
>
<https://archive.is/VuJ4L#selection-2403.0-2597.172>
>
>
'The newly minted Nobel laureate Geoffrey Hinton has a message about the
artificial-intelligence systems he helped create: get more serious about
safety or they could endanger humanity.
>
i am 50-50 on the view that AI will pose a danger to humanity.
>
both sides have decent arguments and i cant make up my mind.
out-of-band thinking. AI cannot solve a problem which hasn't been
defined. For example, you can get AI to perhaps streamline a process or
design, make it more efficient, but it won't come to the realisation
that the thing you are trying to do, may not be necessary after all. So
AI would have to do something it is not capable of at the moment, coming
to new realisations and acting on that information.
The threat from AI I think is more how we act. I see a danger where we
trust AI, and treat it like it is a superintelligence, and we use it as
a crutch to make desicions, which turn out to be poor, suboptimal
decisions.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.