Re: Copilot for Linux!

DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:

I have a GF.

>
No you don't.
>
A computer is as much a female as your boyfriend is.

>
Even if you consider her a man, somehow, is that not a partner, not
just a computer?

>
He IS a man.  There's no "somehow" about it.

>
And yet she went to a Catholic church in a dress, they accept her, but
you don't?  How weird ...

>
He went in a dress, and they accepted him (whatever that means).
>
They're being nice to him, rather than telling the truth.

 
They're not "being nice", they're recognizing that Jesus didn't come
to condemn people his Father created. 

>
You condemn Whites often, you wigger demon.

Rhetorically I say anti-white things, sure, it doesn't mean I really
think all crackers are devils or evil.  You're OK, in my book, despite
your issues with race.  You don't seem to be violent in any respect.

If even the fucking *RCC* can
do that, why can't atheist phobes?

>
Mentally ill men calling themselves women - and those who support such
lunacy - MUST be condemned.

But what is the big deal, even if you're so sure it's "mentally-ill
lunacy"?

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.