Sujet : Re: 5 Stand-Out LibreOffice Features That Make It My Go-To Office Suite
De : ronb02NOSPAM (at) *nospam* gmail.com (RonB)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 18. Oct 2024, 08:13:31
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vet1qr$36h65$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
On 2024-10-17, CrudeSausage <
crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
Le 2024-10-17 à 03 h 16, rbowman a écrit :
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 06:24:11 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:
I think, sometimes, when you're selling a product (rather than releasing
it as open source) there's pressure to change SOMETHING because it has
to be different in order to separate it from the earlier version. The
interface should stay the same — what they should do is just keep fixing
the software and only add features people really want. That's the way to
NOT get bloatware.
FOSS isn't immune to the 'we've got to change something' trap. Unity comes
to mind.
>
I never thought that Unity was all that bad. If anything, its mere
existence forced the developers of other desktop environments to improve
their work, at least as far as aesthetics are concerned. I believe that
the more competition there is, the better each product becomes.
The whole concept of Unity was to be a "one size fits all" solution for
desktops/laptops, tablets and smartphones. I never bought into that as you
use these platforms differently. Microsoft tried the same thing with Windows
8, and it was also a failure.
I went away from Gnome when Gnome 3 came out. I think that's when Linux Mint
really started to climb in popularity. Mate was a reaction to Gnome 3, and
Mint's own Cinnamon came along a bit later. Both are related to Gnome, but
radically different and much more "traditional."
But choice is good. A lot of people like Gnome and that's fine. Just not
something I like at all.
-- “Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien