Re: Neofetch/neowofetch

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Neofetch/neowofetch
De : candycanearter07 (at) *nospam* candycanearter07.nomail.afraid (candycanearter07)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 18. Oct 2024, 21:30:03
Autres entêtes
Organisation : the-candyden-of-code
Message-ID : <slrnvh5gpc.3njae.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote at 20:04 this Friday (GMT):
Le 18-10-2024, candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> a écrit :
>
Isn't neofetch considered unsupported? Not that it matters that much,
but still.
>
It looks like it is from github, but it's the first time I heard about it. I've
never saw any warning from archlinux about it. If there is no bug and if
there is nothing to improve maybe it's the reason it's archived in
github.


That would make sense. It's simple enough that the dev probably wasn't
working on it for years.
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

Date Sujet#  Auteur
18 Oct 24 * Neofetch/neowofetch17Chris Ahlstrom
18 Oct 24 `* Re: Neofetch/neowofetch16Joel
18 Oct 24  `* Re: Neofetch/neowofetch15Chris Ahlstrom
18 Oct 24   +* Re: Neofetch/neowofetch10Joel
18 Oct 24   i+* Re: Neofetch/neowofetch2Chris Ahlstrom
18 Oct 24   ii`- Re: Neofetch/neowofetch1Joel
18 Oct 24   i+* Re: Neofetch/neowofetch6DFS
18 Oct 24   ii`* Re: Neofetch/neowofetch5Joel
18 Oct 24   ii `* Re: Neofetch/neowofetch4DFS
18 Oct 24   ii  `* Re: Neofetch/neowofetch3Joel
18 Oct 24   ii   +- Re: Neofetch/neowofetch1Chris Ahlstrom
19 Oct 24   ii   `- Re: Neofetch/neowofetch1DFS
18 Oct 24   i`- Re: Neofetch/neowofetch1DFS
18 Oct 24   `* Re: Neofetch/neowofetch4candycanearter07
18 Oct 24    `* Re: Neofetch/neowofetch3Stéphane CARPENTIER
18 Oct 24     `* Re: Neofetch/neowofetch2candycanearter07
19 Oct 24      `- Re: Neofetch/neowofetch1rbowman

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal