Sujet : Re: Neofetch/neowofetch
De : candycanearter07 (at) *nospam* candycanearter07.nomail.afraid (candycanearter07)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 18. Oct 2024, 21:30:03
Autres entêtes
Organisation : the-candyden-of-code
Message-ID : <slrnvh5gpc.3njae.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Stéphane CARPENTIER <
sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote at 20:04 this Friday (GMT):
Le 18-10-2024, candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> a écrit :
>
Isn't neofetch considered unsupported? Not that it matters that much,
but still.
>
It looks like it is from github, but it's the first time I heard about it. I've
never saw any warning from archlinux about it. If there is no bug and if
there is nothing to improve maybe it's the reason it's archived in
github.
That would make sense. It's simple enough that the dev probably wasn't
working on it for years.
-- user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom
Re: Neofetch/neowofetch
Re: Neofetch/neowofetch