Sujet : Re: Neofetch/neowofetch
De : bowman (at) *nospam* montana.com (rbowman)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 19. Oct 2024, 03:03:58
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <lngiceFs9nrU2@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 20:30:03 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote at 20:04 this Friday (GMT):
Le 18-10-2024, candycanearter07
<candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> a écrit :
>
Isn't neofetch considered unsupported? Not that it matters that much,
but still.
>
It looks like it is from github, but it's the first time I heard about
it. I've never saw any warning from archlinux about it. If there is no
bug and if there is nothing to improve maybe it's the reason it's
archived in github.
That would make sense. It's simple enough that the dev probably wasn't
working on it for years.
My kind of stuff. I've used the expat library for parsing XML for years.
It's shown a little more activity lately, mainly cosmetic touch-ups but it
often went years between versions. After initial fixes it worked well and
continued to work well. No surprises like when OpenSSL went to 3.x.
Neofetch/neowofetch
Re: Neofetch/neowofetch