Sujet : Re: Another Bug-Ridden Dimdows Update
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 23. Oct 2024, 01:31:31
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <3ugghj1rodpu6u6psk6cqbnj9a0jqcdufn@4ax.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <
ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
Another update to Windows 11, another bunch of things breaks
<https://www.zdnet.com/article/microsoft-blocks-windows-11-24h2-update-for-some-pcs-following-bug-onslaught/>.
>
Microsoft is legendary, isn’t it, for ensuring full backward
compatibility in every single update of Windows. That’s why people are
so quick to accept the updates -- because they know all their existing
stuff, going back years or decades, will continue working without
missing a beat. It’s a no-brainer -- they know they can trust
Microsoft!
Yep, another public beta test. They never learn. I got out before
the boat sank. Sayonara, Winblows.
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.