Sujet : Re: YouTube Linux advocate: Linux could surpass Windows on the desktop
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 23. Oct 2024, 05:27:04
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <diughjlhi8sn3dk6usatnu893kpk137r6c@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <
ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 20:29:45 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
>
I've owned products from both Android manufacturers and Apple and I
have yet to see Android behave like anything more than a clunky
version of iOS.
You didn’t notice that Android did multitasking from the beginning,
instead of trying to add multiple Morse-code-encoded functions to a
single button?
I had an early Android device. The multitasking on it was no better than
what iOS was offering.
>
IOS couldn’t even do background tasks. Android could, right from the
beginning.
Apple is crapware, it's that simple. The iPhone is advanced hardware
with toy software, just like the Apple-centric dimensions of macOS,
sure they run on top of real Unix, great, but you'd never know it, to
use their garbage. I'd rather go back to Win11, than buy a fuckin'
Mac. They can keep that overpriced, right-brain-centric, goofy junk.
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.