Sujet : Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security
De : lt (at) *nospam* gnu.rocks (Lester Thorpe)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy comp.os.linux.miscSuivi-à : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 24. Oct 2024, 19:53:03
Autres entêtes
Organisation : UsenetExpress - www.usenetexpress.com
Message-ID : <pan$a07bd$b7612cf4$ae87cf15$3b59d42c@gnu.rocks>
References : 1 2
On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 03:07:15 -0400,
186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
Yes, you can go totally overboard on "security",
and, mostly, it won't do much good. Paranoia can
push this to extremes where you can barely use
the system/apps (think Vista) - and I think that's
what Linus is concerned with.
You should read the comments in the Phoronix link.
Several posters indicate that there is a vast difference
between security that is relevant for a public-facing
server and for a desktop workstation. Furthermore, the
posters claim, most GNU/Linux distros are configured
for public-facing servers only.
This is totally ridiculous. As I already stated, there
should be a split between servers and workstations.
But there is not, and unless one "rolls ones own" then
one is stuck with a security-laden and crippled distro.
-- Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.