Sujet : Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy comp.os.linux.miscDate : 25. Oct 2024, 23:13:52
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vfh570$3brp2$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 18:10:06 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote at 22:19 this Thursday (GMT):
>
Unfortunately, you can never be sure your RNG is good.
You could always do what random.org does and read background radiation.
Probably.
You can read anything you like. You can never be sure that the digital
bits your CPU sees bear any relation to the raw random data your sensor
was picking up.