Sujet : Re: Report: Arm cancelling contract with Qualcomm
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 26. Oct 2024, 00:00:55
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <mn8ohj5tftqji4j467nosbpmviv8b3urnl@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <
ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
Nothing in the document you linked to says it can't run on Apple metal,
just implying that it isn't supported by M$.
>
I assume Microsoft “supports” those techniques because they are the only
ones that offer anything approaching a quality user experience.
>
Obviously trying to run Windows-on-ARM on bare Apple metal does not.
It's not obvious. The only obvious thing is that they don't want to
tell you it's OK, to do it.
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.